tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4103925900569325548.post44185158353326683..comments2024-03-26T05:23:11.280-07:00Comments on WOLVES IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING: FALSE PROPHETS AND BIBLE TEACHERS IN THE LAST DAYS: C.I. SCOFIELD'S HIDDEN SIDE BY DAVE MACPHERSONTreena Gisbornhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16783721039030779975noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4103925900569325548.post-31989226456579113422017-07-17T14:09:28.377-07:002017-07-17T14:09:28.377-07:00Thanks for your truthful and much needed comments ...Thanks for your truthful and much needed comments about criminal Scofield and his Bible, Colin. Speaking of evolution, here's a spoof I ran across several years ago on the net that was, to my knowledge, never approved by Darwin:<br /><br /> Big Evolution Discovery !<br /><br /> British professor Nigel Swiggerton of Chapsworth College has recently found a missing link in the evolution/creation debate. Everyone is familiar with the "stages of man" chart found in textbooks which begins with a naked, hairy, bent over, grunting Neanderthal type which over millions of years finally learns how to stand erect while sporting a 1930s-style haircut. Well, Dr. Swiggerton discovered that someone accidentally reversed the negative. It turns out that the first man was actually standing erect with a short haircut but has been descending over the years until he has finally reached the last stage - the stage at any rock concert filled with naked, hairy, bent over, grunting Neanderthal types!Irvhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07634792243846422285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4103925900569325548.post-57260090715276722732017-07-17T04:12:37.873-07:002017-07-17T04:12:37.873-07:00What a 'fine' man Mr Scofield was!
Even i...What a 'fine' man Mr Scofield was!<br /><br />Even if the publisher asked Mr MacPherson to write a preface for the Scofield Bible, I'll bet it wouldn't dent its sales! People will believe what they want to believe.<br />Although these 'notes' are not inserted into the actual verses, nevertheless they still lead folk astray. I don't know how close this comes to a violation of Revelation 22.18, as the reference is right next to the verse of truth? <br /><br />It is a wonder that some Christian scientist hasn't come up with "The Evolution Bible" where the marginal notes on Genesis 1.1 would read; <br />"And this all happened after a BIG BANG! and umpteen billion years later, the Creation account now proceeds"!<br />God bless.colinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07132820921599851331noreply@blogger.com