Apostasy - The Prophecy Watchers
Mondo Gonzales: "Is the apostasy of 2 Thessalonians 2:3 referring to a spiritual rebellion of the Church? Is it a rebellion of the Jewish people? Or is it in reference to the physical departure of the rapture?"
Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction.. (2 Thessalonians 2:1-3).
Gonzales’ critical error is that he collapses two distinct eschatological categories—the great tribulation and the day of the Lord—into a single event encompassing the entire seven year period. Once these are conflated, he arrives at the erroneous conclusion that “we are saved from the future 7‑year tribulation day of the Lord.” The New Testament does not support this interpretation. Tribulation (thlipsis) is consistently portrayed as satanic and directed against the saints, while wrath (orgé) is consistently divine and directed against the earth‑dwellers. Paul’s teaching is precise: believers are delivered from the coming wrath i.e. the day of the Lord, but not from the great tribulation.
The Thessalonian church had been misled by some false information that the day of the Lord had already arrived. Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come.
Below is an example of the exegetically implausible and logically unsound claims of pretribulation teachers:
Gonzales refers to Andy Woods' untenable claim that apostasia as "spiritual departure" rather than apostasy/rebellion. The claim that apostasia denotes a physical departure has no lexical support; the evidence consistently points to a spiritual or religious defection, not a spatial removal. For me, this line of argument is simply an exercise in manufactured mischief.
And when the dragon saw that he had been thrown to the earth, he pursued the woman (Israel) who had given birth to the male child. But the woman was given two wings of a great eagle to fly from the presence of the serpent to her place in the wilderness, where she was nourished for a time, and times, and half a time. Then from his mouth the serpent spewed water like a river to overtake the woman and sweep her away in the torrent. But the earth helped the woman and opened its mouth to swallow up the river that the dragon had poured from his mouth. And the dragon was enraged at the woman and went to make war with the rest of her children, who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus. (Revelation 12:13-17).
Immediately after the tribulation (thlipsis) of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. (Matthew 24:29-31 cf. 2 Peter 3:10).
And I watched as the Lamb opened the sixth seal, and there was a great earthquake, and the sun became black like sackcloth of goat hair, and the whole moon turned blood red, 13and the stars of the sky fell to the earth like unripe figs dropping from a tree shaken by a great wind. The sky receded like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved from its place. Then the kings of the earth, the nobles, the commanders, the rich, the mighty, and every slave and free man hid in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains. And they said to the mountains and the rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of the One seated on the throne, and from the wrath (ὀργῆς) of the Lamb. For the great day of Their wrath (ὀργῆς) has come, and who is able to withstand it?” (Revelation 6:12-17).
I will not pursue Gonzales’ tangled reasoning any further. His exegesis is so poor that it is remarkable anyone still defends a view rooted in the mid‑19th century and unknown to the early church. Pretribulationism is rejected by a large portion of global Christianity; its acceptance is largely limited to certain Western circles that have embraced this serious doctrinal error.
Paul’s argument is straightforward: the church is not appointed to the eschatological wrath associated with the day of the Lord. (1 Thessalonians 1:10; 5:9). The term orgē refers specifically to the day of the Lord's wrath, which is not to be confused with the tribulation. (Matthew 24:21). In the previous letter to the Thessalonians Paul instructed believers: to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, Jesus who delivers us from the wrath (ὀργῆς) to come. (1 Thessalonians 1:10). This deliverance is explicitly from divine wrath, not from the Antichrist’s persecution.
Gonzales’ critical error is that he collapses two distinct eschatological categories—the great tribulation and the day of the Lord—into a single event encompassing the entire seven year period. Once these are conflated, he arrives at the erroneous conclusion that “we are saved from the future 7‑year tribulation day of the Lord.” The New Testament does not support this interpretation. Tribulation (thlipsis) is consistently portrayed as satanic and directed against the saints, while wrath (orgé) is consistently divine and directed against the earth‑dwellers. Paul’s teaching is precise: believers are delivered from the coming wrath i.e. the day of the Lord, but not from the great tribulation.
The Thessalonian church had been misled by some false information that the day of the Lord had already arrived. Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come.
Robert Thomas: "Let me belabor this point a little further. Some people interpret that the apostasy and man of sin must come before the arrival of the DOTL (day of the Lord). This is unfortunate because the word “before” or “precede” does not appear anywhere in these verses. This erroneous interpretation leads some people to embrace a pre-wrath rapture view. For them, the rapture cannot happen until the apostasy and man of sin are revealed before the arrival of the DOTL. They have made a serious mistake. Paul never says that these two events happen before the arrival of the DOTL. He says that they are the first events which kick off the DOTL."
The text does not state “before" or "precede" but it does explicitly state that the rebellion comes first (πρῶτον proton).
Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion (apostasia) comes first (πρῶτον), and the man of lawlessness is revealed.. (2 Thessalonians 2:3).
Gonzales misidentifies the day of the Lord as “the time of Jacob’s trouble” (Jeremiah 30:7; Daniel 9:24–27). Yet again he repeats the same category error by treating the entire seven‑year period as the day of the Lord and collapsing the tribulation into it. In scripture, the time of Jacob’s trouble refers to the Antichrist’s persecution—i.e., the great tribulation—which begins at the midpoint of Daniel’s seventieth week. When Satan fails to annihilate Israel, he redirects his hostility toward believers, “those who keep the commandments of God and hold the testimony of Jesus.” This persecution precedes the rapture, which occurs between the sixth and seventh seal of Revelation.
Immediately after the tribulation (thlipsis) of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. (Matthew 24:29-31 cf. 2 Peter 3:10).
I will not pursue Gonzales’ tangled reasoning any further. His exegesis is so poor that it is remarkable anyone still defends a view rooted in the mid‑19th century and unknown to the early church. Pretribulationism is rejected by a large portion of global Christianity; its acceptance is largely limited to certain Western circles that have embraced this serious doctrinal error.
No comments:
Post a Comment