THE FLAT EARTH MODEL

If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame. (Proverbs 18:13) 

  .....test everything; hold fast what is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

Like many other people, the flat earth model is something I have never previously thought about seriously. However, having done some research into the subject, and to my own astonishment, I find that I am unable to debunk it. I believe it is worth investigating this subject despite its detractors and the stigma attached to it. Most people's reaction will be to dismiss the flat-earth view out of hand, but perhaps we should not be too hasty in forming an opinion after all.

The heliocentric system of worship forms the basis of Roman Catholicism and its Luciferian system, sun worship having been merged with Christianity through the Emperor Constantine and the bishops of Rome in the fourth century.
 
The Roman Catholic view of the sun as the centre of the cosmos was accepted about five hundred years ago, after the Jesuit Order was founded in 1540 during the Counter Reformation. The astronomical  model which proposed that the earth and planets revolve around the sun at the centre of the solar system was revived from Greek philosophy and presented by Renaissance mathematician, astronomer and Roman Catholic cleric Nicolaus Copernicus in 1543. (Colossians 2:8).{1} It was under the auspices of the RC Church that Copernicus made his theories known and proposed the new heliocentric model of the universe which gained a hold at a time when many people were uneducated and therefore unequipped to challenge it. Amazingly the heliocentric theory was taught as "fact" universally without direct proof until scientific proof was supposedly provided by Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel's trigonometric parallax method in 1838.{2}

Heliocentrism was strongly opposed by Reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin who upheld the traditional geocentric model which placed a flat, enclosed earth at the centre of the cosmos:

"Luther took the days of creation as literal 24-hour days, with the sun and other heavenly bodies created on day 4 and that he believed all this took place less than 6,000 years before." {3}

Luther: "There is talk of a new astrologer who wants to prove that the earth moves and goes around instead of the sky, the sun, the moon, just as if somebody were moving in a carriage or ship might hold that he was sitting still and at rest while the earth and the trees walked and moved. But that is how things are nowadays: when a man wishes to be clever he must needs invent something special, and the way he does it must needs be the best! The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside-down. However, as Holy Scripture tells us, so did Joshua bid the sun to stand still and not the earth." {4} 

"Some years after the publication of De Revolutionibus John Calvin preached a sermon in which he denounced those who "pervert the order of nature" by saying that "the sun does not move and that it is the earth that revolves and that it turns." {5} 

Is the notion of a globe-shaped world orbiting the sun a myth?

Interestingly the NATO logo is a flat earth surrounded by laurel leaves. Laurel is the symbol of Apollo aka Apollyon/Destroyer/Abaddon/Lucifer. (Revelation 9:11)

"If you set a bearing due South from anywhere on Earth, inevitably at or before 78 degrees Southern latitude, you will find yourself face-to-face with an enormous ice-wall towering 100-200 feet in the air extending to the East and West the entire circumference of the world!"

"Captain Cook and crew sailed a total of 60,000 miles along the Antarctic coastline never once finding an inlet or path through or beyond the massive glacial wall!  Captain Cook wrote: 'The ice extended east and west far beyond the reach of our sight, while the southern half of the horizon was illuminated by rays of light which were reflected from the ice to a considerable height.  It was indeed my opinion that this ice extends quite to the pole, or perhaps joins some land to which it has been fixed since creation.'"

"On October 5th, 1839 another explorer, James Clark Ross began a series of Antarctic voyages lasting a total of 4 years and 5 months.  Ross and his crew sailed two heavily armored warships thousands of miles, losing many men from hurricanes and icebergs, looking for an entry point beyond the southern glacial wall.  Upon first confronting the massive barrier Captain Ross wrote of the wall, “extending from its eastern extreme point as far as the eye could discern to the eastward.  It presented an extraordinary appearance, gradually increasing in height, as we got nearer to it, and proving at length to be a perpendicular cliff of ice, between one hundred and fifty feet and two hundred feet above the level of the sea, perfectly flat and level at the top, and without any fissures or promontories on its even seaward face.  We might with equal chance of success try to sail through the cliffs of Dover, as to penetrate such a mass.” 

"'The British Ship Challenger recently completed the circuit of the Southern region - indirectly, to be sure - but she was three years about it, and traversed nearly 69,000 miles - a stretch long enough to have taken her six times round on the globular hypothesis.'  -William Carpenter" {6}

The first supposed flight over Antarctica was made by Lincoln Ellsworth on his third attempt with Herbert Hollick-Kenyon. However, they were forced to abort the attempt several times, and because their sextant was faulty they could not achieve accurate readings. There is no footage of their expedition.{7}

Houston, we have a problem..

NASA (aka Never A Straight Answer) is the main organisation to disseminate information about the universe and how it functions. However, it takes very little research to establish that NASA is a very dishonest organisation. To name just a few of NASA's many inconsistencies:

* The alleged moon landing in 1969 is now widely doubted and throws up a number of questions as demonstrated in the video by Ralph René A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.{8}
* The nervous press conference of Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and his two colleagues following the supposed "moon landing" very strongly suggests that something is not right.{9}
* NASA announced that the original telemetry tapes which captured the first moonwalk videos were "lost".{10}
* Neil Armstrong was unduly reticent and subdued about the moon landing for the rest of his life and refused to give interviews for years. Armstrong was said to be a committed Christian, but actually he was a "Deist" which is not the same thing. Buzz Aldrin suffered a nervous breakdown and became an alcoholic following the mission.
* NASA openly admits that the photographs of the earth from space are photoshopped. {11}
* The tragic "deaths" of the Challenger astronauts are an outrageous sham! By all accounts they are still alive and kicking, two of them are explained away by the very rare phenomenon of identical twins.{12}
* There is strong evidence to suggest that the Mars mission was fake.{13}
I could give many more examples, but needless to say that the circus they call NASA hardly engenders public confidence in their ability to tell the truth! NASA's 2016 black hole budget of $19.3 billion is truly astronomical!

Armstrong displays Masonic Apron on "the moon"

NASA is literally crawling with Freemasons. C. Fred Kleinknecht, head of NASA at the time of the Apollo Space Program, is now the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Council of the 33rd Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction. {14}
A  bewildering list of NASA's Masonic astronauts can be found on the following link: http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/masonic-astronauts/

In common with NASA, many of the world's space programmes share the Vector or V symbolism in their logo: "It is, in fact, a sign of Satan, of malediction, of the horned God, Pan, and worse." {15}

For a little further insight into this symbol watch the short video below: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NETEiWn5dko

Too may sixes? The scientists? tell us that the earths axial tilt is 66.6 degrees in a 90 degree quadrant. The earths orbital speed around the sun is 66,600 miles an hour and the earths curvature drop in one mile is 0.666ft.
This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666. (Revelation 13:17-18 cf. Revelation 15:2).
 
Jacob Prasch Moriel Ministries
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCnKVlLEMrM

A disturbing development has recently transpired, in that the faithful remnant church are being persuaded by some leaders to discard the geocentric model on their say so alone, without undertaking a critical analysis of the facts. (Proverbs 18:2). Jacob Prasch concerns me. He has denounced and derided all flat-earth considerations, telling his followers not to pay any attention to them and calling those Christians who take them seriously "ignorant". He takes quite a bit of time at the beginning of this video naming and discrediting Robert Sungenis who challenges the heliocentric view. Is this a red herring? It seems highly unlikely that genuine born-again Christians would be looking to Sungenis in any capacity, spiritual or otherwise, since he claims to be an apologist for the Roman Catholic Church.{16}

Prasch promotes himself as some sort of spiritual guru in his "questions" series on Moriel TV (also aired on YouTube). I would advise his supporters to be extremely wary of taking everything Prasch says as "gospel". His intra-seal theory is full of holes {17} and his endorsement of certain ecumenicals is enough for us to question his true loyalties.{18} Anyone who endorses NASA has either not done their research or they are part of the problem! If Prasch is right in rejecting the flat earth model, he should be able to debunk it biblically and scientifically, without deviating into all sorts of irrelevant subjects as he did in this particular video. I have viewed many websites and links, and I have never heard any Christian teacher or leader say that the flat-earth view must be accepted by faith alone as Prasch claims. In fact there are a growing number of non-Christians who take the flat earth view seriously. The secular websites I have viewed have produced their own evidence for a flat-earth, and they have debunked (or claimed to debunk) the heliocentric model without taking faith considerations into account.

Despite the Bible primarily being a "theological book" as Prasch says, we should not be guilty of spiritualizing the factual information it conveys because it is at odds with so called "science". Are we not encouraged to take the Bible literally unless it states otherwise? The information given in the scriptures does not support the heliocentric model, and this should be a concern given its dubious history and the lies of NASA and other agencies. Born again Christians take literally the truth concerning the person of Jesus Christ i.e. the virgin birth and His resurrection from the dead etc. without any reliance on scientific proof. We rely on faith of course, but it is not blind faith given that the Word of God, and in particular biblical prophecies concerning Christ are very specific. Similarly, I do not think that blind faith is involved in accepting the biblical model of creation. There would be no reason for God to give us such a detailed account of creation in the Book of Genesis if He were not wanting to tell us something. (2 Timothy 2:15).

The sun and moon were created on the fourth day, after the creation of the earth:

And God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars..... And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day. (Genesis 1:14-19) 

In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth. (Genesis 1:1; cf. Genesis 2:4; Psalm 148:13; Zechariah 5:9). The heaven (sky or aerial firmament) is referred to as an expanse - "From raqa'; properly, an expanse, i.e. The firmament or (apparently) visible arch of the sky -- firmament." {19} The lights (sun moon and stars) were set inside the expanse (Genesis 1:14-17).

Nothing in the scriptures or the extra-biblical texts indicate that the moon reflects the light of the sun. The scriptures describe the sun and the moon as two great lights (luminaries), the moon being the lesser light. (Genesis 1:16). Jesus prophesied .....and the moon shall not give its light. (Matthew 24.29). The sun and moon were created for the benefit the earth i.e. to separate the day from the night, for signs and for seasons, for days and years and to give light upon the earth. (Genesis 1:14). 

I do not claim that the Book of Enoch is canonical, but its astronomical formulas are remarkably accurate. Enoch Chapter 72 describes the moon also as a "luminary" in its own right.{20} and further explains the various positions of the sun and the moon which rise and set from six portals. Enoch also tells us that the sun and the moon are the same size, and that the sun shines seven times brighter than the moon. {21}The greater and lesser lights of Genesis 1:16 refer to comparative luminosity rather than size if we take Enoch's account to be accurate. A minority of translations have, in my view, wrongly translated greater and lesser lights to larger and smaller lights.{22}

The Book of Enoch corresponds with the psalmist:

In them he has set a tent for the sun,
which comes out like a bridegroom leaving his chamber,
and, like a strong man, runs its course with joy.
Its rising is from the end of the heavens,
and its circuit to the end of them,
and there is nothing hidden from its heat.
(Psalm 19:4-6).

The age of the earth is also related to this topic. According to Wikpedia, the age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%) "This dating is based on evidence from readiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the radiometric ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples." {23} Many Christians believe that the earth (or at least the biosphere) is approximately six thousand years old, choosing not to accept the phantom "evidences" provided by science. 

Is the biblical description of the moon as a luminary just a question of semantics? Stars have been observed through the dark parts moon, suggesting that it is translucent and not a solid spherical object.{24} There are also videos of the moon in front of the clouds which are difficult to explain away as so called "anomalies".

I have added some links at the bottom of this post with some very interesting information about the complexities involved in determining the true nature of the moon and its effects upon the earth.

Expanding Universe?

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God finished his work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work that he had done. So God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it God rested from all his work that he had done in creation. (Genesis 2:1-3). 

The above verses state that God finished creating the heavens and the earth in six days. The scriptures contradict Hubble's Law, i.e. the scientific assertion that the universe is still developing and expanding. 

The Sixth Seal of Revelation:  

When he opened the sixth seal, I looked, and behold, there was a great earthquake, and the sun became black as sackcloth, the full moon became like blood, and the stars of the sky fell to the earth as the fig tree sheds its winter fruit when shaken by a gale. The sky vanished like a scroll that is being rolled up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.and the stars of the sky fell to the earth as the fig tree sheds its winter fruit when shaken by a gale. (Revelation 6:12-14 cf. Isaiah 34:4; Matthew 24:29; Mark 14:25).

The flat earth model is depicted as a circle inside a square. The scriptures refer to the earth not as a ball, but as a circle and also as having four corners.

It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; (Isaiah 40:22 cf. Proverbs 8:27). Can we force a globe upon the text here? The Hebrew word for "circle" is "chug" {25} as against the Hebrew word for "ball" "dur" as in Isaiah 22:18. {26}  

After this I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth..... (Revelation 7:1)

The devil took Jesus to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory in order to tempt him. (Matthew 4:8). Why would the devil take Jesus to a very high mountain if this is metaphoric?

The long day of Joshua: It is repeated no less than five times in the Book of Joshua that the sun stopped : And the sun stood still, and the moon stopped..... (Joshua 10:12-13 cf. Habakkuk 3:11). These events were recorded in the missing Book of Jasher or the Book of the Upright which is referred to more than once in the scriptures. (2 Corinthians 13:1). Furthermore Psalms 93 and 104:9 and Ecclesiastes 1:5 also speak of celestial motion and terrestrial stability.

There are no less than sixty seven Bible references which tell us that the sun and not the earth moves {27}

Can Jacob Prasch explain why we should we believe the Jesuits, the Roman Catholics, the Freemasons, Skull and Bones and NASA's lies and photoshopped images! Can he explain why we should not research the geocentric model without the biases imposed upon us by the world, and why we should not study the scriptures, the relevant extra biblical material and seek the Lord? (2 Peter 1:5). I do not expect Prasch to answer these questions by the way!

IF the geocentric model is taken as a true representation of reality, it is a game changer to a significant degree. Critically, this model completely debunks UFO's and extra terrestrials, something which is accepted as a possibility by many, including the Vatican. One possible end time scenario is the deception that our "creators" were spiritual beings from a distant galaxy and have now returned to help us out. If the geocentric model is the truth and accepted as such, it would have the benefit of protecting those who believe it from this particular deception, if in fact this is the way the enemy plays it. (Matthew 24:24).

This is a huge subject which has many twists and turns. It is not practical to go into all the complexities of geocentrism in this post, but there are many websites which give good information. I have listed just a few points and some of my own thoughts below.

Satellites? Many flat earth advocates dismiss satellites as a hoax. Satellites are alleged to be on a low earth orbit (LEO). For instance, the International Space Station is said to be on an LEO of about 250 miles above the earth's surface. Flat-earth proponents vary in their calculations, but 3000 miles seems to be a ballpark figure that many of them use as the distance of the sun from the earth. IF 3000 miles is correct, it does not preclude the existence of satellites at 250 miles or less, though according to the geocentric model they would would somehow be circling a flat earth rather than orbiting a spherical earth. We are told that geocentric satellites are placed at an altitude of approximately 22,300 miles directly over the equator, revolving in the same direction the earth rotates (west to east). In other words they appear stationary as seen from the earth ... hmm interesting!  

Why did the Roman church condemn Galileo (1564-1642) for promoting the heliocentric model when they had previously encouraged Copernicus to publicise the model one hundred years earlier?
The Jesuits employ devious tactics and often play both sides in order to achieve their ultimate nefarious ends. They may have seemed to reject Galileo's theory due to a longer term plan of ultimately accepting it, hence they employed the Hegelian Dialectic: "Hegelian dialectic, usually presented in a threefold manner..... as comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction, an antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis."{28} 

What about circumnavigation?
The United Nations logo demonstrates the flat earth model with the north pole at the centre and Antarctica around the outer edge. The continents are spread around the north pole. On a compass, east and west are always at right angles to the north. Therefore to travel in an easterly direction is in fact a circular journey around the north pole.

Do meteorites have a cosmic origin?   
The word  "meteor" comes from the Greek word for "atmospheric. Prior to the nineteenth century there were differing views on the source of meteorites, but a widely held view was that meteors were formed in the atmosphere. According to Oliver C. Farrington in his paper 'The Pre-Terrestrial History of Meteorites' (1901):  "Meteorites have been declared to be (I) terrestrial matter discharged into space by the volcanoes of the earth and returned to it again (Sir Robert Ball); (2) matter discharged from the volcanoes of the moon (La Place, J. Lawrence Smith); (3) matter ejected from the sun (Sorby); (4) portions of shattered stars (Meunier); (5) portions of a shattered planet (Boisse); (6) portions of comets (Newton); (7) clouds of gas or dust cemented and solidified by the action of the earth's atmosphere (Brezina). All of these hypotheses have been urged by men of eminence, each urging strong reasons for his views." {29} 

The cosmic origin of meteors was established by Yale University Professor, Benjamin Silliman based on his analysis of the Connecticut Weston meteorite in 1807. Silliman's analysis subsequently formed the foundation of modern scientific research, and his views are now taken as a given. However his deduction was not without its detractors: "President Thomas Jefferson (who had studied natural sciences) made a memorable statement. 'I would sooner believe that two Yankee professors would lie than that stones would fall from heaven!'"{30} Silliman is recorded as being a Skull and Bones member in 1837.{31} It seems to me that Silliman's analysis, just like the views of the other "eminent" men mentioned above, is hypothetical. Just because Silliman's extraterrestrial analysis fits into the current worldview, should we blindly accept it?

Is Copernicanism the foundation that is holding up ALL evolutionary science?
Marshall Hall (1931-2013) author of The Earth Is Not Moving: "The Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting Earth is a fact-less, observation-denying deception that is the keystone which is holding up all of modern man's false 'science' and 'knowledge'". {32}

Marshall Hall argued that there has been an incremental progression from the physical sciences of astronomy and physics to the natural sciences. The heliocentric view of the earth makes us inconsequential on a universal level, whereas Darwinism degrades human beings into evolved animals. I would agree that we are being taken apart piecemeal as human beings made in the image of God. (Genesis 1:27). Many people now accept as the norm the secularisation of society which has led to the evils of political correctness, abortion and its devaluation of human life and sexual deviance. The Five Categories of Knowledge according to Marshall are: "Physical Sciences; Natural Sciences; Social [and Behavioral] Sciences; Arts & Humanities; Religion." {32} It is clear that humanity is undergoing the final stages of the satanically orchestrated deception to completely destroy man's relationship with his creator.

Freemasonry is not only a dominant feature within NASA, it also played a very big part in the exploration of the Antarctic. The early explorers including Scott, Amundsen and Shackleton were Freemasons. Antarctic explorer Admiral Byrd was a 33rd degree Freemason. Byrd established First Antarctic Lodge No. 777 of New Zealand constitution on February 5, 1935. Many anomalies surround Byrd's expedition to Antarctica in 1946-7, Operation Highjump, which ended abruptly six months early. We might speculate, but frankly there is no way of ascertaining what actually happened during Operation Highjump since the data immediately became top secret classified information on the return of the navy.

Antarctica became a scientific preserve in 1959. The international Antarctic Treaty System ensures that no one can get anywhere near the area apart from authorised personnel. There are no commercial flights over Antarctica, despite it being the shortest direct route between South Africa/Australia/South America.

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is built 8000ft beneath the Antarctic ice to investigate neutrinos.{33} Coincidentally, neutrino's are what CERN are involved with in their "dark matter" experiments! 

There can be no doubt that the people at the very top of governments and the sciences are Luciferians and are being directed by the spirit of Antichrist. Whatever is going on with NASA, NATO and in the Antarctic .....the whole world lies in the power of the evil one. (1 John 5:19 cf. John 8:44). The enemy is at work in many different ways. There are men like Prasch who pour derision on the credibility of the geocentric model in order to make its proponents look ridiculous. There are also bogus flat-earth theorists out there who deliberately disseminate false information that can easily be discredited, again making the model look ridiculous. Believers should at least be prepared to prayerfully consider the possibility that this subject could be a critical part of the spiritual battle going on between good and evil. (Genesis 3:1; 2 Corinthians 11:3).

Whose "science" should we believe? I have not formed a definitive conclusion about a flat-earth at this time, but my view of reality has been challenged. The more I look into the flat earth model, the more wonder whether the populace may have been subject to a mass cosmological deception as part of the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation strategy which has its tentacles spread throughout the governments of the earth. 

{1}   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism
{2}   http://science.jrank.org/pages/3276/Heliocentric-Theory-triumph-heliocentric-theory.html
{3}   https://answersingenesis.org/hermeneutics/biblical-interpretation/
{4}   http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast161/Unit3/response.html 
{5}   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism 
{6}   http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/06/south-pole-does-not-exist.html 
{7}   http://www.royalaviationmuseum.com/2596/first-flight-over-antarctica/ 
{8}   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4
{9}   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tjCP3myofE
{10} http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nasa-tapes-idUSTRE56F5MK20090716
{11} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFBAznZwqVg 
{12} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4t4fjYkWc8   
{13} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5_Il2tAT7U
{14} https://aplanetruth.info/space-travelers-and-freemasons/ 
{15} http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/codex_magica/codex_magica25.htm 
{16} http://www.robertsungenis.org/  
{17} http://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/jacob-prasch-rapture-holy-spirit-and.html  
{18} http://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/jacob-prasch-moriel-ministries-further.html. 
{19} http://biblehub.com/hebrew/7549.htm
{20} http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/boe076.htm 
{21} http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/boe077.htm 
{22} http://biblehub.com/genesis/1-16.htm
{23} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth 
{24} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-8XKCYg1vY 
{25} http://biblehub.com/hebrew/2329.htm 
{26}http://biblehub.com/hebrew/1754.htm
{27}http://www.fixedearth.com/sixty-seven-references.html
{28}https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic#Hegelian_dialectic
{29} https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30058802.pdf
{30} https://www.sott.net/article/238325-Science-Debunked-Meteorites
{31} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Skull_and_Bones_members
{32} http://www.fixedearth.com/fact-less-copernican-model.html
{33} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/10465749/Telescope-buried-in-Antarctic-ice-detects-elusive-neutrinos.html

Further Links: 
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/We%20Never%20Went%20To%20The%20Moon%20-%20By%20Bill%20Kaysing.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajOmmIKnSH0 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMBqvQvF_LI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWQDS-4MBFk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk5ASPOkW74
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhRiLP32qfs
http://testingtheglobe.com/bible.html
http://www.granddesignexposed.com/sun/baal.html 
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Circumnavigation 
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/library/pamphlets/One%20Hundred%20Proofs%20that%20the%20Earth%20is%20not%20a%20Globe%20(William%20Carpenter).pdf
http://www.wildheretic.com/is-the-moon-an-optical-illusion/
http://www.philipstallings.com/2015/07/the-biblical-flat-earth-early-church.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZP_VZ_Ehvk
http://antisupremacy.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/operation-highjump-over-ice-wall_31.html

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Antarctica-Does-End-comprehended-breadth-ebook/dp/B01NBV68K1/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1484839759&sr=8-1&keywords=colin+ford+flat+earth

Disclaimer: 
I do not necessarily endorse the above links or vouch for their validity.