Search This Blog

Friday, 23 December 2016


For the upright will inhabit the land, and those with integrity will remain in it,
but the wicked will be cut off from the land, and the treacherous will be rooted out of it.
(Proverbs 2:21-22)

Sarah Acott's experience with Howard Conder is indeed a very sad one, though it is not untypical of those who have challenged Revelation TV and their unorthodox fund raising tactics. Sarah wrote a report to the Trustees of the Revelation Foundation in 2012 that challenged the Conders claim that they received no financial benefit from Revelation TV. Below is an excerpt from that report:

"The issue I wish to raise is that donors to the channel are being mislead in the way that funds are raised and presented on the Building the Foundation programme. The programme leads the viewer to believe that the finances reported on the pie charts are a representation of the entire channels financial operation. This is not true and could be accused of being fraudulent. I am only bringing this to you because I believe that this is something that you as the legal overseers should be aware of.
It became obvious to me when I watched one of the first Building the Foundation programmes years ago. The income stated leaves out one of the largest income streams into the channel – airtime and advertising sales. Having worked in the office during the set up of the channel I know about the 21st Century television account and believe that the money from this huge source of income is going straight into this account. From what I can gather from the charities commission website 21stCentury Television makes donations to the Revelation Foundation....." {1}

Sarah went public three years later, and in May 2015 she began her blog GodvsChristianity which is an exposé of RTV.{1} As a whistle blower Sarah has been derided and persecuted for publicly revealing the misleading fund raising tactics of RTV, and both she and her family have been dragged through the mud. When she decided to go public, myself, Rob Thomas and Nev Stephens fully supported her. Nev's U-turn was inexplicable, but myself and Rob have continued to condemn RTV's unethical practices and false teaching.{2} I believe that Sarah has genuinely attempted to make amends with Howard Conder et al, but so far there has been no resolution. I personally was rather sceptical about the meetings she arranged with various Trustees from the Revelation Foundation. Nevertheless, it was Sarah's decision to have these talks, and I whilst disagreed and felt that the meetings were not scriptural, I respected her decision.

Howard Conder has stated publicly and repeatedly that he will not forgive his detractors. (Matthew 6:14-15). In addition, there is absolutely no sign of the false teachers being removed from RTV's programming, in fact just the reverse is the case. In my view, Conder's behaviour indicates that he is, in all probability, a reprobate, in which case meetings and attempted reconciliation are a pointless exercise. The Trustees have been challenged many times, and still RTV continue to air false teachers, rip off their viewers and abuse their detractors. The scriptural procedure for a fellow Christian who has sinned against us personally is very clear. Firstly we are to approach the person privately. If that fails, then we should take two or three others along, and if that also fails, then finally we should tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. In other words, an unrepentant Christian should be should be treated as a social pariah! (Matthew 18:15-17 cf. 2 Thessalonians 3:6, 14). Sarah has gone through all of the above stages with no result, and in my view she is being played by the Trustees.

Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit. (Matthew 15:14).  

Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. (Ephesians 5:11).

Sarah believed that she had a friend and ally in Yemi Balogun. In fact, Balogun was not only a personal friend of Sarah's, he was also a trusted family friend. Balogun privately agreed with Sarah's concerns and made a number of assertions that he would publicly expose Howard Conder/RTV. I wondered why he wanted to delay, and once again I was sceptical. Nevertheless I decided to wait and see what he would do. I was not at all surprised when he failed to come forward and nothing happened. It appears now that he was playing both sides all along! Although Sarah and others have been hurt by Balogun's deception and slander, it is Balogun himself who should be concerned. How much worse punishment, do you think, will be deserved by the one who has trampled underfoot the Son of God, and has profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has outraged the Spirit of grace? (Hebrews 10:26-30).

A Little About Yemi Bolugun:

RTV Presenter Yemi Balogun aka Omoyemi Hakeem Balogun.
Yemi Balogun left Revelation TV in June 2011 to set up his own TV station. He became a Director of The Kingdom TV which was dissolved in 2014.

The Kingdom TV Ltd 19 Netley Drive, Walton-On-Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom, KT12 3QX  previously  REVELATION TV (AFRICA) LIMITED Dissolved 13th May 2014. {3}
Director: Omoyemi Hakeem Balogun appointed 13 January 2011.
Director:  Sylvia Sophia BANNERMAN-BALOGUN appointed 28 February 2011.
Secretary: Ian Gordon Pettie appointed 13th January 2011 - resigned 28th February 2011. In fact Pettie resigned the same day that Sylvia BANNERMAN-BALOGUN was appointed as Director and Secretary. {4}

I am not aware what exactly happened with Balogun's TV venture, other than that it was dissolved in 2014. During the time Balogun was absent from RTV, he communicated several things to Sarah Acott and others about the mis-deeds of RTV and the Conders. Much to our surprise, Balogun returned to RTV this year and is now denying that he ever condemned the Conders. In fact his denials are rather too loud! Having once escaped the worldly defilements of RTV, he has become entangled once again and allied himself with these apostates. (2 Peter 2:20).  Balogun's realliance with RTV and his forceful, but false denouncements and denials, are not only a betrayal of those who believed in his integrity, they are a betrayal of Christ Himself! (Matthew 26:69-75) He has failed a critical test! (2 Corinthians 13:5). The apostle Paul was willing to work with his own hands in order to support himself. It is shameful that many so called "pastors" are not willing to do the same. (Acts 18:3; 1 Corinthians 4:12; 1 Timothy 6:10). The "hireling" mentality is prevalent amongst those who make a show of godliness as a way to become wealthy, those who in reality care nothing for the sheep. (1 Timothy 6:5; John 10:13). My advice to Yemi Balogun: If you have not been successful in your so called "ministry", then earn your living honestly and do not seek your living from those who fleece the sheep for dishonest gain by the promotion of false teaching. The price will be ultimately very high for false teachers: For them the gloom of utter darkness (blackest hell) has been reserved. (2 Peter 2:17-18).

Two or Three Witnesses

The principle of two or three witnesses is extremely important if we are making accusations against a fellow Christian. The principle is repeated so many times in both the Old and New Testaments that I think we must take it seriously. (Matthew 18:16; cf. Numbers 35:30; Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15; 2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19). I do believe Sarah's word alone is a truthful narrative of Balogun's betrayal, but in addition, there are further witnesses. This is in fact a double betrayal for Sarah, since it adds further pain to the original betrayal she suffered at the hands of RTV. 

Balogun gained the confidence of Sheila, Sarah and Chris. That is three witnesses who communicated with him directly about the conduct of Howard and Leslie Conder. (2 Corinthians 13:1). Sheila left a comment publicly on Sarah Acott's blog in 2015:

18th June 2015
Sheila: “Yemi balogun who once worked at REV TV is a witness to one lot of abuse/ridicule from Leslie which she said in his presence.I had finished with them totally. Never even thought of putting them on TV ever. “ {5}

Both Sarah Acott and Chris have given me permission to publish the emails I have received from them concerning Balogun. Below are some of the communications I have received from them both:

11th June 2015:
Sarah:"Yemi is popping down to the diner tomorrow afternoon. When I spoke to him before he said that he has been waiting for the right time to expose Howard, if now isn't it, I honestly don't know when would be.
Please pray that it will be a good meeting and that he will join us in this. He's a good man and a family friend. He's also very proud of what we have achieved, so it will be good to talk to him even if he only gives advice."

12th June 2015:
Sarah: "I'm meeting with Yemi later on today, so will give you all an update as soon as I can....."

13th June 2015:
Sarah:  "Not so great news re Yemi... he didn't make it! Unfortunately, he got held up, but will hopefully reschedule soon. He's still really positive on what we are doing so hopefully will see him next week."

15th December 2015
Sarah: "Yemi came to my diner last week. He’s one of the good ones. Just sad that Howard saw him as 'competition'”. {6}
Anonymous: "Now there is a very humble Man , Nice he came to see you. Yemi, he told me about Howards refusing to share a studio with him as it would be competition to him, I was astounded as I thought all Christian TV had the common goal of saving souls , I was not aware that competition came into it at all."
My reason for contacting Yemi was that on air Leslie was he usual condescending self towards me, insulting me and being sarcastic, calling me Mrs xxxxx, Yemi and Sylvia had no idea of the history of her and Howards abusve ways towards me and they joined in and laughed, when I enlightened him as to the whole story and of the disgusting things I had learned about the Conder children via their various social media sights , he apologised profoundly on behalf of himself and Sylvia, he also confided in me that he was about to leave and told me al about how howard had upset many people including himself and Sylvia and was always too proud to aplogise. I imagine you had some interesting conversation with him at your diner Sarah."
Sarah: Yes Yemi is a good and humble man. He will hopefully pop down to the diner and see Chris over the next few weeks too."  {6}

14th October 2016: 
Sarah: "Off the record... 
Yes... it's complicated and I'm confused about the situation to be honest. He's a family friend and it's not what I expected from him.
I texted Yemi about it and apparently they contacted him. He prayed about it and felt to go back. That decision is between him and God, but what concerns me is that he is endorsing the channel. He's by no means ignorant so his position is odd.
He might pop down to the diner over the next few weeks. I'm trying to be positive as the timing is interesting as my meeting with the two Alans were productive and this could be the start of a change from within. 
If I do get to see Yemi I do intend to be straight with him that I don't object to his return necessarily, but I do object to him endorsing them."
Chris: "Yes, I saw him appear on Time for Revelation last Wednesday (Oct 5th) and I was livid. Yemi is supposed to be coming to England for a few weeks. Sarah and I are going to try to get him over to her diner so that we can catch up!"
Chris: "Yes, he is being two-faced at the moment but Sarah and I will try to fix him :-)
He's just made a huge error of judgement."

14th December 2016:
Sarah: "Chris told Howard about Yemi giving him the information regarding 21st Century TV Ltd. Yemi has denounced our evidence as “gossip” and “innuendo”. He lied about various things and even named my father who has actively distanced himself from the situation.
I’m really saddened. As you know, I considered Yemi a friend and he knows that my mum has recently had a heart attack and yet told outright lies including that I have tried to blackmail him. I asked him to meet and explain himself to Chris, but he’s ignored me.
Yemi made it look like he has not given any information of significance to Chris or others, but I know he even told you some very serious things before he left RTV." 

22nd December 2016:
Chris: "Hi Treena,
There have been so many members of staff and volunteers who knew what was going on. They just left quietly. It strikes me that none of them have any Christian-integrity or even normal professional-integrity.
I'm not sure what to say about Yemi... On that programme, 10 days ago, he was grossly understating his involvement in the situation. He knows exactly what the evidence is and that it is not just "gossip and innuendo."
I think that he is having some-kind of mid-life crisis and feels desperately sorry that his own attempt at a Christian TV station failed. But, returning to Revelation TV has seriously compromised his integrity and he knows it.
Is Yemi just a weak man who cannot carry through his convictions ??  He obviously does know that things are not right with RTV and yet he has crawled back."

As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus so that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith. The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. Certain persons, by swerving from these, have wandered away into vain discussion, desiring to be teachers of the law, without understanding either what they are saying or the things about which they make confident assertions.
Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted. (1 Timothy 1:3-11)

The Charity Commission's statutory inquiry into the Revelation Foundation:

"In March 2014 complaints were received from members of the public alleging the charity was being used for private advantage. A subsequent scrutiny of the charity’s accounts by the commission identified regulatory concerns which include potential significant loss of charitable funds, trustee benefits, conflicts of interest and connected party transactions. These concerns are primarily in relation to the production and broadcasting of television programmes from Spain as well as the trustees’ decisions to transfer significant charitable assets and funds from the UK to Spain." {7}


Friday, 9 December 2016


If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame. (Proverbs 18:13) 

  .....test everything; hold fast what is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

Like many other people, the flat earth model is something I have never previously thought about seriously. However, having done some research into the subject, and to my own astonishment, I find that I am unable to debunk it. I believe it is worth investigating this subject despite its detractors and the stigma attached to it. Most people's reaction will be to dismiss the flat-earth view out of hand, but perhaps we should not be too hasty in forming an opinion after all.

The heliocentric system of worship forms the basis of Roman Catholicism and its Luciferian system, sun worship having been merged with Christianity through the Emperor Constantine and the bishops of Rome in the fourth century.
The Roman Catholic view of the sun as the centre of the cosmos was accepted about five hundred years ago, after the Jesuit Order was founded in 1540 during the Counter Reformation. The astronomical  model which proposed that the earth and planets revolve around the sun at the centre of the solar system was revived from Greek philosophy and presented by Renaissance mathematician, astronomer and Roman Catholic cleric Nicolaus Copernicus in 1543. (Colossians 2:8).{1} It was under the auspices of the RC Church that Copernicus made his theories known and proposed the new heliocentric model of the universe which gained a hold at a time when many people were uneducated and therefore unequipped to challenge it. Amazingly the heliocentric theory was taught as "fact" universally without direct proof until scientific proof was supposedly provided by Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel's trigonometric parallax method in 1838.{2}

Heliocentrism was strongly opposed by Reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin who upheld the traditional geocentric model which placed a flat, enclosed earth at the centre of the cosmos:

"Luther took the days of creation as literal 24-hour days, with the sun and other heavenly bodies created on day 4 and that he believed all this took place less than 6,000 years before." {3}

Luther: "There is talk of a new astrologer who wants to prove that the earth moves and goes around instead of the sky, the sun, the moon, just as if somebody were moving in a carriage or ship might hold that he was sitting still and at rest while the earth and the trees walked and moved. But that is how things are nowadays: when a man wishes to be clever he must needs invent something special, and the way he does it must needs be the best! The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside-down. However, as Holy Scripture tells us, so did Joshua bid the sun to stand still and not the earth." {4} 

"Some years after the publication of De Revolutionibus John Calvin preached a sermon in which he denounced those who "pervert the order of nature" by saying that "the sun does not move and that it is the earth that revolves and that it turns." {5} 

Is the notion of a globe-shaped world orbiting the sun a myth?

Interestingly the NATO logo is a flat earth surrounded by laurel leaves. Laurel is the symbol of Apollo aka Apollyon/Destroyer/Abaddon/Lucifer. (Revelation 9:11)

"If you set a bearing due South from anywhere on Earth, inevitably at or before 78 degrees Southern latitude, you will find yourself face-to-face with an enormous ice-wall towering 100-200 feet in the air extending to the East and West the entire circumference of the world!"

"Captain Cook and crew sailed a total of 60,000 miles along the Antarctic coastline never once finding an inlet or path through or beyond the massive glacial wall!  Captain Cook wrote: 'The ice extended east and west far beyond the reach of our sight, while the southern half of the horizon was illuminated by rays of light which were reflected from the ice to a considerable height.  It was indeed my opinion that this ice extends quite to the pole, or perhaps joins some land to which it has been fixed since creation.'"

"On October 5th, 1839 another explorer, James Clark Ross began a series of Antarctic voyages lasting a total of 4 years and 5 months.  Ross and his crew sailed two heavily armored warships thousands of miles, losing many men from hurricanes and icebergs, looking for an entry point beyond the southern glacial wall.  Upon first confronting the massive barrier Captain Ross wrote of the wall, “extending from its eastern extreme point as far as the eye could discern to the eastward.  It presented an extraordinary appearance, gradually increasing in height, as we got nearer to it, and proving at length to be a perpendicular cliff of ice, between one hundred and fifty feet and two hundred feet above the level of the sea, perfectly flat and level at the top, and without any fissures or promontories on its even seaward face.  We might with equal chance of success try to sail through the cliffs of Dover, as to penetrate such a mass.” 

"'The British Ship Challenger recently completed the circuit of the Southern region - indirectly, to be sure - but she was three years about it, and traversed nearly 69,000 miles - a stretch long enough to have taken her six times round on the globular hypothesis.'  -William Carpenter" {6}

The first supposed flight over Antarctica was made by Lincoln Ellsworth on his third attempt with Herbert Hollick-Kenyon. However, they were forced to abort the attempt several times, and because their sextant was faulty they could not achieve accurate readings. There is no footage of their expedition.{7}

Houston, we have a problem..

NASA (aka Never A Straight Answer) is the main organisation to disseminate information about the universe and how it functions. However, it takes very little research to establish that NASA is a very dishonest organisation. To name just a few of NASA's many inconsistencies:

* The alleged moon landing in 1969 is now widely doubted and throws up a number of questions as demonstrated in the video by Ralph René A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.{8}
* The nervous press conference of Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and his two colleagues following the supposed "moon landing" very strongly suggests that something is not right.{9}
* NASA announced that the original telemetry tapes which captured the first moonwalk videos were "lost".{10}
* Neil Armstrong was unduly reticent and subdued about the moon landing for the rest of his life and refused to give interviews for years. Armstrong was said to be a committed Christian, but actually he was a "Deist" which is not the same thing. Buzz Aldrin suffered a nervous breakdown and became an alcoholic following the mission.
* NASA openly admits that the photographs of the earth from space are photoshopped. {11}
* The tragic "deaths" of the Challenger astronauts are an outrageous sham! By all accounts they are still alive and kicking, two of them are explained away by the very rare phenomenon of identical twins.{12}
* There is strong evidence to suggest that the Mars mission was fake.{13}
I could give many more examples, but needless to say that the circus they call NASA hardly engenders public confidence in their ability to tell the truth! NASA's 2016 black hole budget of $19.3 billion is truly astronomical!

Armstrong displays Masonic Apron on "the moon"
NASA is literally crawling with Freemasons. C. Fred Kleinknecht, head of NASA at the time of the Apollo Space Program, is now the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Council of the 33rd Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction. {14}
A  bewildering list of NASA's Masonic astronauts can be found on the following link: http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/famous/masonic-astronauts/

In common with NASA, many of the world's space programmes share the Vector or V symbolism in their logo: "It is, in fact, a sign of Satan, of malediction, of the horned God, Pan, and worse." {15}

For a little further insight into this symbol watch the short video below: 

Too may sixes? The scientists? tell us that the earths axial tilt is 66.6 degrees in a 90 degree quadrant. The earths orbital speed around the sun is 66,600 miles an hour and the earths curvature drop in one mile is 0.666ft.
This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666. (Revelation 13:17-18 cf. Revelation 15:2).
Jacob Prasch Moriel Ministries

A disturbing development has recently transpired, in that the faithful remnant church are being persuaded by some leaders to discard the geocentric model on their say so alone, without undertaking a critical analysis of the facts. (Proverbs 18:2). Jacob Prasch concerns me. He has denounced and derided all flat-earth considerations, telling his followers not to pay any attention to them and calling those Christians who take them seriously "ignorant". He takes quite a bit of time at the beginning of this video naming and discrediting Robert Sungenis who challenges the heliocentric view. Is this a red herring? It seems highly unlikely that genuine born-again Christians would be looking to Sungenis in any capacity, spiritual or otherwise, since he claims to be an apologist for the Roman Catholic Church.{16}

Prasch promotes himself as some sort of spiritual guru in his "questions" series on Moriel TV (also aired on YouTube). I would advise his supporters to be extremely wary of taking everything Prasch says as "gospel". His intra-seal theory is full of holes {17} and his endorsement of certain ecumenicals is enough for us to question his true loyalties.{18} Anyone who endorses NASA has either not done their research or they are part of the problem! If Prasch is right in rejecting the flat earth model, he should be able to debunk it biblically and scientifically, without deviating into all sorts of irrelevant subjects as he did in this particular video. I have viewed many websites and links, and I have never heard any Christian teacher or leader say that the flat-earth view must be accepted by faith alone as Prasch claims. In fact there are a growing number of non-Christians who take the flat earth view seriously. The secular websites I have viewed have produced their own evidence for a flat-earth, and they have debunked (or claimed to debunk) the heliocentric model without taking faith considerations into account.

Despite the Bible primarily being a "theological book" as Prasch says, we should not be guilty of spiritualizing the factual information it conveys because it is at odds with so called "science". Are we not encouraged to take the Bible literally unless it states otherwise? The information given in the scriptures does not support the heliocentric model, and this should be a concern given its dubious history and the lies of NASA and other agencies. Born again Christians take literally the truth concerning the person of Jesus Christ i.e. the virgin birth and His resurrection from the dead etc. without any reliance on scientific proof. We rely on faith of course, but it is not blind faith given that the Word of God, and in particular biblical prophecies concerning Christ are very specific. Similarly, I do not think that blind faith is involved in accepting the biblical model of creation. There would be no reason for God to give us such a detailed account of creation in the Book of Genesis if He were not wanting to tell us something. (2 Timothy 2:15).

The sun and moon were created on the fourth day, after the creation of the earth:

And God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars..... And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day. (Genesis 1:14-19) 

In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth. (Genesis 1:1; cf. Genesis 2:4; Psalm 148:13; Zechariah 5:9). The heaven (sky or aerial firmament) is referred to as an expanse - "From raqa'; properly, an expanse, i.e. The firmament or (apparently) visible arch of the sky -- firmament." {19} The lights (sun moon and stars) were set inside the expanse (Genesis 1:14-17).

Nothing in the scriptures or the extra-biblical texts indicate that the moon reflects the light of the sun. The scriptures describe the sun and the moon as two great lights (luminaries), the moon being the lesser light. (Genesis 1:16). Jesus prophesied .....and the moon shall not give its light. (Matthew 24.29). The sun and moon were created for the benefit the earth i.e. to separate the day from the night, for signs and for seasons, for days and years and to give light upon the earth. (Genesis 1:14). 

I do not claim that the Book of Enoch is canonical, but its astronomical formulas are remarkably accurate. Enoch Chapter 72 describes the moon also as a "luminary" in its own right.{20} and further explains the various positions of the sun and the moon which rise and set from six portals. Enoch also tells us that the sun and the moon are the same size, and that the sun shines seven times brighter than the moon. {21}The greater and lesser lights of Genesis 1:16 refer to comparative luminosity rather than size if we take Enoch's account to be accurate. A minority of translations have, in my view, wrongly translated greater and lesser lights to larger and smaller lights.{22}

The Book of Enoch corresponds with the psalmist:

In them he has set a tent for the sun,
which comes out like a bridegroom leaving his chamber,
and, like a strong man, runs its course with joy.
Its rising is from the end of the heavens,
and its circuit to the end of them,
and there is nothing hidden from its heat.
(Psalm 19:4-6).

The age of the earth is also related to this topic. According to Wikpedia, the age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%) "This dating is based on evidence from readiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the radiometric ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples." {23} Many Christians believe that the earth (or at least the biosphere) is approximately six thousand years old, choosing not to accept the phantom "evidences" provided by science. 

Is the biblical description of the moon as a luminary just a question of semantics? Stars have been observed through the dark parts moon, suggesting that it is translucent and not a solid spherical object.{24} There are also videos of the moon in front of the clouds which are difficult to explain away as so called "anomalies".

I have added some links at the bottom of this post with some very interesting information about the complexities involved in determining the true nature of the moon and its effects upon the earth.

Expanding Universe?

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God finished his work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work that he had done. So God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it God rested from all his work that he had done in creation. (Genesis 2:1-3). 

The above verses state that God finished creating the heavens and the earth in six days. The scriptures contradict Hubble's Law, i.e. the scientific assertion that the universe is still developing and expanding. 

The Sixth Seal of Revelation:  

When he opened the sixth seal, I looked, and behold, there was a great earthquake, and the sun became black as sackcloth, the full moon became like blood, and the stars of the sky fell to the earth as the fig tree sheds its winter fruit when shaken by a gale. The sky vanished like a scroll that is being rolled up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.and the stars of the sky fell to the earth as the fig tree sheds its winter fruit when shaken by a gale. (Revelation 6:12-14 cf. Isaiah 34:4; Matthew 24:29; Mark 14:25).

The flat earth model is depicted as a circle inside a square. The scriptures refer to the earth not as a ball, but as a circle and also as having four corners.

It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; (Isaiah 40:22 cf. Proverbs 8:27). Can we force a globe upon the text here? The Hebrew word for "circle" is "chug" {25} as against the Hebrew word for "ball" "dur" as in Isaiah 22:18. {26}  

After this I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth..... (Revelation 7:1)

The devil took Jesus to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory in order to tempt him. (Matthew 4:8). Why would the devil take Jesus to a very high mountain if this is metaphoric?

The long day of Joshua: It is repeated no less than five times in the Book of Joshua that the sun stopped : And the sun stood still, and the moon stopped..... (Joshua 10:12-13 cf. Habakkuk 3:11). These events were recorded in the missing Book of Jasher or the Book of the Upright which is referred to more than once in the scriptures. (2 Corinthians 13:1). Furthermore Psalms 93 and 104:9 and Ecclesiastes 1:5 also speak of celestial motion and terrestrial stability.

There are no less than sixty seven Bible references which tell us that the sun and not the earth moves {27}

Can Jacob Prasch explain why we should we believe the Jesuits, the Roman Catholics, the Freemasons, Skull and Bones and NASA's lies and photoshopped images! Can he explain why we should not research the geocentric model without the biases imposed upon us by the world, and why we should not study the scriptures, the relevant extra biblical material and seek the Lord? (2 Peter 1:5). I do not expect Prasch to answer these questions by the way!

IF the geocentric model is taken as a true representation of reality, it is a game changer to a significant degree. Critically, this model completely debunks UFO's and extra terrestrials, something which is accepted as a possibility by many, including the Vatican. One possible end time scenario is the deception that our "creators" were spiritual beings from a distant galaxy and have now returned to help us out. If the geocentric model is the truth and accepted as such, it would have the benefit of protecting those who believe it from this particular deception, if in fact this is the way the enemy plays it. (Matthew 24:24).

This is a huge subject which has many twists and turns. It is not practical to go into all the complexities of geocentrism in this post, but there are many websites which give good information. I have listed just a few points and some of my own thoughts below.

Satellites? Many flat earth advocates dismiss satellites as a hoax. Satellites are alleged to be on a low earth orbit (LEO). For instance, the International Space Station is said to be on an LEO of about 250 miles above the earth's surface. Flat-earth proponents vary in their calculations, but 3000 miles seems to be a ballpark figure that many of them use as the distance of the sun from the earth. IF 3000 miles is correct, it does not preclude the existence of satellites at 250 miles or less, though according to the geocentric model they would would somehow be circling a flat earth rather than orbiting a spherical earth. We are told that geocentric satellites are placed at an altitude of approximately 22,300 miles directly over the equator, revolving in the same direction the earth rotates (west to east). In other words they appear stationary as seen from the earth ... hmm interesting!  

Why did the Roman church condemn Galileo (1564-1642) for promoting the heliocentric model when they had previously encouraged Copernicus to publicise the model one hundred years earlier?
The Jesuits employ devious tactics and often play both sides in order to achieve their ultimate nefarious ends. They may have seemed to reject Galileo's theory due to a longer term plan of ultimately accepting it, hence they employed the Hegelian Dialectic: "Hegelian dialectic, usually presented in a threefold manner..... as comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction, an antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis."{28} 

What about circumnavigation?
The United Nations logo demonstrates the flat earth model with the north pole at the centre and Antarctica around the outer edge. The continents are spread around the north pole. On a compass, east and west are always at right angles to the north. Therefore to travel in an easterly direction is in fact a circular journey around the north pole.

Do meteorites have a cosmic origin?   
The word  "meteor" comes from the Greek word for "atmospheric. Prior to the nineteenth century there were differing views on the source of meteorites, but a widely held view was that meteors were formed in the atmosphere. According to Oliver C. Farrington in his paper 'The Pre-Terrestrial History of Meteorites' (1901):  "Meteorites have been declared to be (I) terrestrial matter discharged into space by the volcanoes of the earth and returned to it again (Sir Robert Ball); (2) matter discharged from the volcanoes of the moon (La Place, J. Lawrence Smith); (3) matter ejected from the sun (Sorby); (4) portions of shattered stars (Meunier); (5) portions of a shattered planet (Boisse); (6) portions of comets (Newton); (7) clouds of gas or dust cemented and solidified by the action of the earth's atmosphere (Brezina). All of these hypotheses have been urged by men of eminence, each urging strong reasons for his views." {29} 

The cosmic origin of meteors was established by Yale University Professor, Benjamin Silliman based on his analysis of the Connecticut Weston meteorite in 1807. Silliman's analysis subsequently formed the foundation of modern scientific research, and his views are now taken as a given. However his deduction was not without its detractors: "President Thomas Jefferson (who had studied natural sciences) made a memorable statement. 'I would sooner believe that two Yankee professors would lie than that stones would fall from heaven!'"{30} Silliman is recorded as being a Skull and Bones member in 1837.{31} It seems to me that Silliman's analysis, just like the views of the other "eminent" men mentioned above, is hypothetical. Just because Silliman's extraterrestrial analysis fits into the current worldview, should we blindly accept it?

Is Copernicanism the foundation that is holding up ALL evolutionary science?
Marshall Hall (1931-2013) author of The Earth Is Not Moving: "The Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting Earth is a fact-less, observation-denying deception that is the keystone which is holding up all of modern man's false 'science' and 'knowledge'". {32}

Marshall Hall argued that there has been an incremental progression from the physical sciences of astronomy and physics to the natural sciences. The heliocentric view of the earth makes us inconsequential on a universal level, whereas Darwinism degrades human beings into evolved animals. I would agree that we are being taken apart piecemeal as human beings made in the image of God. (Genesis 1:27). Many people now accept as the norm the secularisation of society which has led to the evils of political correctness, abortion and its devaluation of human life and sexual deviance. The Five Categories of Knowledge according to Marshall are: "Physical Sciences; Natural Sciences; Social [and Behavioral] Sciences; Arts & Humanities; Religion." {32} It is clear that humanity is undergoing the final stages of the satanically orchestrated deception to completely destroy man's relationship with his creator.

Freemasonry is not only a dominant feature within NASA, it also played a very big part in the exploration of the Antarctic. The early explorers including Scott, Amundsen and Shackleton were Freemasons. Antarctic explorer Admiral Byrd was a 33rd degree Freemason. Byrd established First Antarctic Lodge No. 777 of New Zealand constitution on February 5, 1935. Many anomalies surround Byrd's expedition to Antarctica in 1946-7, Operation Highjump, which ended abruptly six months early. We might speculate, but frankly there is no way of ascertaining what actually happened during Operation Highjump since the data immediately became top secret classified information on the return of the navy.

Antarctica became a scientific preserve in 1959. The international Antarctic Treaty System ensures that no one can get anywhere near the area apart from authorised personnel. There are no commercial flights over Antarctica, despite it being the shortest direct route between South Africa/Australia/South America.

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is built 8000ft beneath the Antarctic ice to investigate neutrinos.{33} Coincidentally, neutrino's are what CERN are involved with in their "dark matter" experiments! 

There can be no doubt that the people at the very top of governments and the sciences are Luciferians and are being directed by the spirit of Antichrist. Whatever is going on with NASA, NATO and in the Antarctic .....the whole world lies in the power of the evil one. (1 John 5:19 cf. John 8:44). The enemy is at work in many different ways. There are men like Prasch who pour derision on the credibility of the geocentric model in order to make it and its proponents look ridiculous. There are also bogus flat-earth theorists out there who deliberately disseminate false information which can easily be discredited, again making the model look ridiculous. Believers should at least be prepared to prayerfully consider the possibility that this subject could be a critical part of the spiritual battle going on between good and evil. (Genesis 3:1; 2 Corinthians 11:3).

I have not formed a definitive conclusion about a flat-earth at this time, but my view of reality has been challenged. The more I look into the flat earth model, the more I am wondering whether the populace may have been subject to a mass cosmological deception as part of the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation strategy which has its tentacles spread throughout governments and science, or rather, pseudo science. Prasch's contempt of "flat earthers" is not helpful. As usual, he takes delight in profession his own strong opinions without referring to the scriptures!

{1}   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism
{2}   http://science.jrank.org/pages/3276/Heliocentric-Theory-triumph-heliocentric-theory.html
{3}   https://answersingenesis.org/hermeneutics/biblical-interpretation/
{4}   http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast161/Unit3/response.html 
{5}   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism 
{6}   http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/06/south-pole-does-not-exist.html 
{7}   http://www.royalaviationmuseum.com/2596/first-flight-over-antarctica/ 
{8}   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4
{9}   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tjCP3myofE
{10} http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nasa-tapes-idUSTRE56F5MK20090716
{11} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFBAznZwqVg 
{12} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4t4fjYkWc8   
{13} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5_Il2tAT7U
{14} https://aplanetruth.info/space-travelers-and-freemasons/ 
{15} http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/codex_magica/codex_magica25.htm 
{16} http://www.robertsungenis.org/  
{17} http://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/jacob-prasch-rapture-holy-spirit-and.html  
{18} http://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/jacob-prasch-moriel-ministries-further.html
{19} http://biblehub.com/hebrew/7549.htm
{20} http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/boe076.htm 
{21} http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/boe077.htm 
{22} http://biblehub.com/genesis/1-16.htm
{23} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth 
{24} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-8XKCYg1vY 
{25} http://biblehub.com/hebrew/2329.htm 
{29} https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30058802.pdf
{30} https://www.sott.net/article/238325-Science-Debunked-Meteorites
{31} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Skull_and_Bones_members
{32} http://www.fixedearth.com/fact-less-copernican-model.html
{33} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/10465749/Telescope-buried-in-Antarctic-ice-detects-elusive-neutrinos.html

Further Links: 


I do not necessarily endorse the above links or vouch for their validity.