Amillennialism (non-millennial) is the view that the millennium and the book of Revelation are allegorical.
Postmillennialism is the view that Jesus Christ will return at the end of an indefinite period of time (the millennium) after the majority of the world has been converted to Christianity. Reformed theologian, Kenneth L Gentry Jr gives a brief summary of modern Reformed postmillennialism below:
"Postmillennialism holds that the Lord Jesus Christ established his kingdom on earth in the first century through his preaching and redemptive work. Since then he has continued to equip his Church with the gospel, empower her by his Spirit, and charge her with the Great Commission to disciple all nations. Postmillennialism expects that eventually the vast majority of men living will be saved. Increasing gospel success will gradually produce a time in history prior to Christ’s return in which faith, righteousness, peace, and prosperity will prevail in the affairs of men and of nations. After an extensive era of such conditions, the Lord will return visibly, bodily, and gloriously, to end history. Associated with his return will be the general resurrection and the final judgment after which the eternal order follows. Because of its worldwide historical implications, postmillennialism generates an holistic worldview touching on all areas of life.." {1}
The aim of this post is to critique the postmillennial view as articulated by James White in the above sermon livestreamed by Apologia Studios on the 14th February 2021.
It doesn't take James White very long to dismiss what he refers to as "beasts in Revelation" and "obscure passages in Daniel". Like many of us, James White admits to having been negatively impacted by "Left Behind" pre-trib dispensational premillennialism as touted by Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye. While I agree that it is advisable to reject the eisegetical teachings of the pre-trib camp, it would be catastrophic to dismiss explicit eschatological material in the book of Revelation and related Old Testament passages. According to pre-trib scholar Arnold Fruchtenbaum, there are over five hundred references to the Old Testament in the Book of Revelation: "Some of these references back to the Old Testament do speak of the very same thing as the Revelation. However, in others, the Revelation merely borrows a phrase or motif for the purpose of developing a new area. This distinction should be kept in mind in the study of those Old Testament references." {2}
The Gnostic Roots of Postmillennialism
In common with Calvinism, the roots of postmillennialism go back to 4th century philosopher, Augustine of Hippo. Augustine infused Christian doctrine with Neoplatonism and was the primary catalyst that brought about a shift in thinking about the literal one thousand year view of the millennium in the west. Most historians agree that Augustine was amillennial, as was Jerome, his counterpart in the Eastern Orthodox Church. In Augustine's City of God, an earthly or physical millennial kingdom is repeatedly dismissed. {3}. In the late 2nd century, a literal thousand years was challenged by Origen and Clement of Alexandria who favoured allegorical biblical interpretations.
The first person to articulate a definitive postmillennial view was Church of England minister, Daniel Whitby (1638-1726).
Clarence Larkin: "... a new interpretation of the Millennial Reign of Christ was demanded. This interpretation was furnished by the Rev. Daniel Whitby (1638–1726), a clergyman of the Church of England, who claimed that in reading the promises made to the Jews in the Old Testament of their restoration as a nation, and the re-establishment of the Throne of David, he was led to see that these promises were spiritual and applied to the Church. This view he called a 'New Hypothesis.'
His 'New Hypothesis' was that by the preaching of the Gospel Mohammedanism would be overthrown, the Jews converted, the Papal Church with the Pope (Antichrist) would be destroyed, and there would follow a 1000 years of righteousness and peace known as the Millennium; at the close of which there would be a short period of Apostasy, ending in the return of Christ." {4}
A postmillennial (allegorical) interpretation of Revelation 20:1-10 is highly problematic for at least four reasons.
1. Postmillennialism does not align with an exegetical reading of Revelation 20:1-10. There is no indication in the book of Revelation that the events described are allegorical. Revelation 1:1 describes "what must (dei - necessarily) soon come to pass". As such we must take the events literally in order to follow accepted principles of sound exegesis.
2. The historic premillennial view was the predominant view of the early church fathers e.g. Irenaeus, Papias, Justin Martyr, Tertullian and Hippolytus. We therefore have early church tradition as a powerful witness attesting to historic premillennialism.
3. Postmillennialism has its roots in Gnosticism.
4. The Enlightenment and the optimism of the 18th century "
the golden age of theodicies". More information on this subject can be found at:
FULL_TEXT.PDF (manchester.ac.uk)
Revelation discloses definitively what must literally soon (tachos - speedily) come to pass.
This is the revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants what must soon come to pass. He made it known by sending His angel to His servant John, who testifies to everything he saw. This is the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear and obey what is written in it, because the time is near. (Revelation 1:1-3 cf. Daniel 12:1-13).
The book of Revelation gives a stern warning not to change (add or subtract) any part of its contents. (Revelation 22:19-20). I don't know what the consequences are for those who either allegorize or reject this book completely!
Postmillennials have made a disastrous false assumption i.e. that the evangelization of the world leads progressively into the millennium and that the majority of people will be saved. However, the scriptures are clear that the evangelization of the world is a prerequisite to God's judgement on the wicked (the Day of the Lord), followed by Christ's physical return when His kingdom will be established on earth as it is in heaven. (Matthew 6:10). And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. (Matthew 24:14). The evangelization of the world is finally fulfilled by the first of the three angels in Revelation 14:6-9.
Then I saw another angel flying directly overhead, with an eternal gospel to proclaim to those who dwell on earth, to every nation and tribe and language and people. And he said with a loud voice, “Fear God and give him glory, because the hour of his judgment has come, and worship him who made heaven and earth, the sea and the springs of water.” (Revelation 14:6-7).
The worldwide proclamation of the gospel by the first angel is followed by a second proclamation, the impending doom of Babylon (second angel); and a third proclamation, the specific warning not to take the mark of the beast (third angel). (Revelation 14:9-11). In light of such explicit warnings, postmillennialism is left floundering.
In this video James White concentrates the entirety of his efforts on Psalm 2, Psalm 110, Isaiah 42:1-4 and 1 Corinthians 15:20-27. These passages are eschatological, but they do not support postmillennialism. In common with the pre-trib rapture theory, not one verse of scripture supports the postmillennial view.
James White's worldly emotional appeal
James White spends some time describing the current global situation as "..a rapid major movement of the entire globe toward a secular anti-Christian mindset and governmental system". He asks: "What is the intention of the church in light of advancing global secular totalitarianism?" I share his concerns about advancing global totalitarianism. However, current events align with the scriptures i.e. things will get worse and worse rather than better. There is no indication in the scriptures that the world will improve, rather the reverse is indicated. (Matthew 24:37; Luke 17: 22 -37; 2 Timothy 3:13; 1 John 2:17).
James White's concerns for our progeny (the future of our children and future generations) appears to be based on an emotional reaction based on human concerns rather than the concerns of God. (Mark 8:33). As believers, our optimism must be founded on the coming of Jesus Christ, our blessed hope, NOT on some unscriptural assumption that the world will eventually be evangelized and will improve. ..waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, (Titus 2:13).
Look up - or wait for the world to improve?
In order to be postmillennial you must reject the book of Revelation, Daniel and associated scriptures. You must also reject the explicit warnings of Jesus Christ concerning the end of the age in the Olivet Discourse. (Matthew 24:3).
Treena, are you aware that Pastor Bill Randles passed away last Friday, January 21st?
ReplyDeleteMy Beloved husband Bill Randles, 62, of Marion, passed away peacefully into the hands of his Savior Jesus, on Friday, January 21, 2022. There will be a visitation from 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Friday, January 28.
His Memorial Service will be on Saturday, January 29, at 10:00 am. Both events will be at Believers In Grace Fellowship, 8600 C Avenue, Marion, Iowa.
All that know him, know he loved deeply and is now rewarded with his crown.
His daughter in law Alexis Randles wrote,
“ My father in love, The most gentle of all giants,
You were many things. Teacher, pastor, father to six, brother to many, grandfather to seventeen, author, traveler, husband of 40+ yrs, the list goes on. I know you weren’t ALL knowing but you sure did know a whole lot. Many hats look good on a guy like you. The best of them all is the crown which you received today. We are left here with questions and a crater in our heart where your laughter and tenderness filled. “Well done, good and faithful servant..” We love you and will continue to praise Him, for He is still faithful.”
https://www.facebook.com/kristin.randles.5
""
Thank you Jeanne.. I am aware that Bill Randles passed away recently. I had a very negative experience with him. He was quite abusive and slanderous towards me and called me a number of nasty names, subsequently deleting and coving up his comments about me. He did eventually apologize for calling me a "feminist", but there were a number of other issues that he needed to address. I felt that he needed to grow up. Nevertheless I hope that he is with the Lord. God bless.
ReplyDelete"Nevertheless I hope that he is with the Lord."
ReplyDeleteWere your disagreements discussed at his blog? Were they over his articles, or his sermons?
Apart from your disagreements with Pastor Randles, were any specific teachings in his sermons that cause you to doubt his salvation? If so, what were they?
The disagreements were about Jacob Prasch and David Nathan.. and the discussions were on his blog. He later deleted the comments that did not suit his perspective. If you read my own blog posts on the subject you will get the picture. My friends at Closing Stages had some problems with him. https://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2019/11/bill-randles-irrational-behaviour-is.html
ReplyDeleteHe was challenged on a number of issues but he refused to answer our questions and I also had an "interesting" exchange with Kristin Randles. https://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-vile-arrogance-of-bill-and-kristin.html
Bill Randles had a very nasty church split a couple of years ago, but I do not know specific details.
People are praising him to the skies.. but my experience was not good.
God bless.
Well, I'm sorry you had such a negative experience. Not knowing the details of the church split, I cannot have an opinion on that and cannot judge him over it. Churches split, and sometimes it isn't amicable. I wasn't involved because I wasn't there. I was not part of the problem nor the solution. TherEfore,anything I would say or speculate on in this matter would be nothing more than gossip. And in my humble opinion, if you weren't part of the problem or the solution you shouldn't bring it into a discussion over your personal experiences with him.
ReplyDeleteIf people are "praising him to the skies", it is probably because they had a very different experience with him, whether through actual relationships or a different interaction with him his blog. Having read and commented on his blog for at least the past five or six years, I know there have been others who took issue with some of his views (not anything to do with Scripture), who were also very contentious and ungracious to the point where they could not accept a view other than their own. One woman in particular bordered on the ridiculous in her comments, and he blocked her. She added nothing of value to the discussions, and was tiresome in her incoherence. She was also eventually blocked by an Australian blogger as well; this blogger had a disagreement with one particular issue, the subject of a couple of Pastor Randles' blogs, and could not just graciously agree to disagree over something that was not an issue of salvation.
For my part, not having met him, I can only judge him based on his sermons and articles. I found him to be incredibly humble, frank, and also insightful regarding the Scriptures, very knowledgable about the OT and history, and always appreciated that he brought things to the present from a prophetic standpoint. I also appreciated the fact that he didn't reduce the Biblical narratives ot mere children's stories.His recent series on Samson, for example, was excellent, as well as his articles on Edom in prophecy. Just yesterday I listened again to a couple of his messages from four years ago on Joseph. (Joseph has often been greatly misunderstood; as Pastor Randles said, sometimes our interpretation reveals our prejudices, and I agree. Same with Jonah, by the way.)
I am glad you view Bill Randles positively Jeanne. I agree that many of his articles were very good. I can only repeat that my personal experience with him was not good. I would just mention that when ALL the elders left Bill Randles' church a couple of years ago it was not just a matter of gossip.. it was in the public domain. Bill Randles would not discuss the matter and details were very sketchy. Those who have not had a nice experience with him have said nothing.. I intended to do likewise until I received your comment. I think enough said at this point.
ReplyDeleteGod bless.
"Postmillennialism is the view that Jesus Christ will return at the end of an indefinite period of time (the millennium) after the majority of the world has been converted to Christianity."
ReplyDeleteIf a millennium is 1000 years, how is that interpreted as an "indefinite" period of time? How do they define a millennium? How does one get an indefinite period of time from 1000 years, and vice versa?
Revelatin 20:1-5..
ReplyDelete1Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the bottomless pita and a great chain. 2And he seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years, 3and threw him into the pit, and shut it and sealed it over him, so that he might not deceive the nations any longer, until the thousand years were ended. After that he must be released for a little while.
4Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed. Also I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. 5The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection. 6Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! Over such the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for a thousand years.
I am not sure where they get an "indefinte period" from.. Revelation 20 is specific. God bless.
ReplyDelete