[google28b52e0868d1e307.html]

Search This Blog

Saturday, 11 April 2026

PAUL WILKINSON: DUMBING DOWN THE RAPTURE

The Simple Truth About the Rapture | Paul Wilkinson | Prophecy Watchers

It is difficult to see how Paul Wilkinson expects discerning viewers to take his contribution seriously when he chooses to appear as a guest on Prophecy Watchers with Gary Stearman. The ministry has accumulated substantial criticism: its heavy commercialisation, its constant product‑driven framing, its acquisition of a former TBN studio, and its self‑promotion through associations with networks like TBN, Daystar, CTN, and Cornerstone. Prophecy Watchers itself highlights these network connections as ministry “breakthroughs", presenting the TBN building purchase and Daystar acceptance as divine endorsements rather than routine media expansion. The platform is also widely perceived as excessively commercial, with nearly every teaching segment tied to DVDs, books, bundles, subscriptions, or “ministry support” packages, creating a closed loop where theological claims feed product sales. External observers echo this perception, describing the ministry as a money‑making scheme with paywall‑adjacent practices.1 In addition, Prophecy Watchers regularly features teachers whose doctrines are considered highly questionable in many conservative theological circles. Wilkinson’s appearance suggests that, for him, alignment on pretribulation eschatology overrides concerns about commercialisation, doctrinal instability, or platform credibility.

Now concerning the times and the seasons, brothers, you have no need to have anything written to you. For you yourselves are fully aware that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. While people are saying, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. But you are not in darkness, brothers, for that day to surprise you like a thief. For you are all children of light, children of the day. We are not of the night or of the darkness. So then let us not sleep, as others do, but let us keep awake and be sober. For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, are drunk at night. But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, having put on the breastplate of faith and love, and for a helmet the hope of salvation. For God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us so that whether we are awake or asleep we might live with him. Therefore encourage one another and build one another up, just as you are doing. (1 Thessalonians 5:1-10)

Wilkinson: "Paul is giving comfort to God's people, which is why Paul says in verse 18 at the very end, 'encourage one another. Comfort one another with these words'. Not 'scare the living daylights out of each other' as many in the church are doing with their tribulationism, but 'comfort, encourage one another.'"

The phrase “peace and security” is not a rapture marker; it is a Day‑of‑the‑Lord marker. It signals the shift from thlipsis (tribulation) to orgē (wrath). Believers are not appointed to wrath, but they will experience the tribulation. (Matthew 24:8,21, 29; Revelation 6:17; 12:17). Wilkinson collapses the distinction between thlipsis and orgē, yet scripture maintains that distinction with clarity.

It is the duty of every responsible interpreter to warn believers about the coming tribulation, not to give them emotional platitudes and false hope. We comfort one another with our ultimate hope, but there will be tribulation, both in the general sense and also in the ultimate sense, before the day of the Lord. Pretrib interpreters fail to prepare believers for this difficult time.

Wilkinson: "I believe this is pertinent to the church with all the talk of tribulationalism. 'You are going to go halfway through it, you are going to five-sevenths of the way through it, you are going to go all the way through it.. or there is no rapture.. we are in it now.' 'But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve, so your minds might be corrupted from the simplicity (ἁπλότης) that is in Christ'  (2 Corinthians 11:3 NKJV). What does Satan want to do? He wants to complicate, he wants to confuse.."

Scripture explicitly places the rapture after the breaking of the sixth seal. (Revelation 6:17; Matthew 24:29–31). This is not an invention of prewrath interpreters, nor is it speculation. It is the plain sequence given in the text. Wilkinson doesn't engage in any technical discussion with the prewrath position; he simply lobs ad hominem attacks and mocks the word of God. 

But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure (ἁπλότης) devotion to Christ. (2 Corinthians 11:3). 

The Greek noun ἁπλότης is translated in several ways across the lexicons. Although the NKJV and some other versions render it as “simplicity",  the term does not mean simplicity in the sense of something reduced, basic, or intellectually minimal. According to Strong’s, it derives from ἁπλοῦς and carries the sense of singleness — subjectively, sincerity without duplicity or self‑interest; objectively, generosity expressed in open‑handed giving.2 The core idea is an undivided, straightforward purpose that manifests as transparent sincerity and liberal generosity, not a call to simplistic thinking.

Wilkinson’s appeal to the “simplicity of the rapture", combined with his claim that he wrote his book for the Gypsy church because they are largely uneducated, effectively positions a vulnerable group as the ideal target for his false teaching. The same dynamic is evident among Prophecy Watchers viewers, who are similarly susceptible and lack discernment. He directs his doctrinal claims toward those he assumes cannot test or critically evaluate them. (1 John 4:1). Scripture repeatedly warns believers not to remain simple‑minded but to pursue understanding (Proverbs 8:5; 9:4, 2 Timothy 2:15, etc.). Peter explicitly acknowledges that some of Paul’s writings are hard to understand and are twisted by the ignorant and unstable to their own destruction (2 Peter 3:16). In other words, not everything is simple, and responsible interpretation requires effort, study, and discernment. This does not require academic training, but it does require a deliberate willingness to seek understanding from the Lord — a request He answers when believers genuinely desire discernment. Wilkinson’s model bypasses this biblical expectation and instead treats doctrinal “simplicity” as a virtue, though scripture never does. Scripture teaches that spiritual truth is spiritually discerned, but this does not create an intellectual hierarchy or endorse a passive, unquestioning faith. It means the Spirit grants understanding as believers engage, examine, and think. No group is exempt from this responsibility, whether educated or not. Wilkinson’s attempt to present the pretribulation rapture as a “simple” doctrine for an allegedly vulnerable audience does not protect them; it exposes them to error with serious consequences.

Wilkinson says, “The rapture is not about a doctrine as such; it is about a Person… the Person of the rapture.” He is correct in principle, yet it is striking that when the disciples asked Jesus about the signs of His coming and the end of the age, His first response was a warning: See that no one leads you astray. (Matthew 24:4). In other words, devotion to the Person does not negate the need for doctrinal clarity or vigilance against deception.

In technical terms, the rapture occurs between the sixth and seventh seals of Revelation. Since no one knows the day or the hour, this is the closest approximation scripture allows us to make at present. To dismiss or mock what God has explicitly stated regarding the timing of the rapture is not a trivial matter, and Wilkinson will ultimately be held accountable for dismissing this clear biblical assertion with such contempt. As I have argued many times previously, those who fail to heed the explicit warnings in the scriptures will be bewildered and unprepared to face the persecution of the Antichrist. I see teachers like Wilkinson as Hananiah figures, i.e. false prophets who do not rightly divide the word of truth, leading believers into false hope. (2 Timothy 2:15; Jeremiah 15:1-16).

Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. (Matthew 24:29-31).

Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things? (2 Thessalonians 2:1-5).

Tuesday, 7 April 2026

CHRIS QUINTANA: WHITEWASHING CHUCK SMITH

Did Chuck Smith Make a False Prophecy? Here's What Scripture Says

Above: Chris Quintana's defence of Chuck Smith and his prediction that the rapture would occur in 1981 due to a misunderstanding of "this generation" in Matthew 24:34.

Chris Quintana spent several minutes insisting that Smith’s prediction was not a “Thus saith the Lord” prophecy—in other words, it was not a direct revelation from God. That distinction functions as an excuse, but it does not resolve the issue. Date‑setting is inherently reckless, and Calvary Chapel has been trying to defend Smith’s misstep ever since. Quintana’s approach feels like an attempt to whitewash a serious error—one that Smith never explained, never corrected, and never owned publicly.

Chuck Smith "I believe that the generation of 1948 is the last generation. Since a generation of judgment is forty years and the Tribulation period lasts seven years, I believe the Lord could come back for His Church any time before the Tribulation starts, which would mean anytime before 1981.
..However, it is possible that Jesus is dating the beginning of the generation from 1967, when Jerusalem was again under Israeli control for the first time since 587 B.C. We don’t know for sure which year actually marks the beginning of the last generation.”

“If the generation begins in 1967 instead of 1948, the timeline shifts, but the expectation remains within that window.” (1967 variant). pp. 35–36 of Chuck Smith’s 1978 booklet End Times

Smith’s 1981 rapture prediction was not an isolated remark; he repeated it in print, including in Future Survival (1973) and Snatched Away (1976), as documented by Calvary Chapel Wiki’s entry on the 1981 prediction.1  

People who acknowledge their mistakes demonstrate genuine integrity—something vital for all believers, but especially influential Bible teachers who carry public trust. Refusal to admit error is driven by fleshly impulses: fear of consequences and the instinct to preserve one’s image. Scripture offers no justification for either. Chuck Smith should have addressed his error publicly, but he chose not to. It is neither wise nor honest to excuse this or to attempt to sanitise his legacy by glossing over it.

Addressing the question: "this generation"

In Matthew 24:34, “this generation” is usually explained in one of three ways.
  1. Preterist: Jesus is referring to His contemporaries.

  2. Futurist: A future “fig tree generation”—the group alive when the end‑time events begin will live to see them completed.

  3. Corporate Israel: “Generation” refers to Israel as a persistent, covenant‑breaking people, echoing Isaiah 6 and the recurring biblical theme of Israel’s resistance to God and rejection of the Messiah until the end of the age.

I find myself resonating with the third view, especially after hearing Peter Goeman’s argument.*

Further Concerns

Chuck Smith was ecumenical and made the unequivocal assertions that Roman Catholics are Christians! In his book, Answers For Today (1993), he made the following ecumenical statement:

"We should realize that we're all part of the Body of Christ and that there aren't any real divisions in the Body. We're all one. What a glorious day when we discover that God loves the Baptists! -- And the Presbyterians, and the Methodists, and the CatholicsWe're all His and we all belong to Him. We see the whole Body of Christ, and we begin to strive together rather than striving against one another" 
(p157). (emphasis mine).

On another occasion, Smith stated unequivocally that Roman Catholics are Christians"I had a cousin who was a mother superior in the Catholic Church and she was just a wonderful Christian. I loved her and we had great conversations together and I didn't try to convert her from Catholicism, nor did she try to convert me into becoming a Catholic.. it is just we both recognise that we had the same Lord and the same faith and so forth.." He goes on to say that the differences between Christians and Catholics are not that great - his conclusion: "Catholics are basically Christians too." 2  

Apart from Smith's false rapture prediction and ecumenism, he regularly appeared on the apostate TV network TBN. False teacher Paul Crouch referred to Smith as a "dear friend" after his death.3 Smith was also a "good friend" of false teacher Rick Warren. Friendships and associations with deceivers such as Paul Crouch and Rick Warren should be unacceptable to any believer committed to biblical integrity.

Smith also continued to sanction the ministry of his close associate, Don Stewart, after his adultery. Don Stewart left his wife and two teenage daughters for no good reason and married another woman in 2011. (Matthew 19:19).4 Smith and Stewart had a long association going back to the early days of Calvary Chapel at Costa Mesa, and they jointly hosted Pastors Perspective for a number of years. Don Stewart continues a high-profile ministry in association with Calvary Chapel despite being an adulterer! He is another "prophecy expert" and false teacher who relentlessly promotes the pretrib rapture error.

Chuck Smith, Paul Cain and the Branham Movement

John Collins, founder of William Branham Historical Research and the Leaving the Message YouTube channel, has documented extensive, verifiable connections between Chuck Smith and Paul Cain, whose ministry is explicitly framed as a continuation of Branham‑style, Latter Rain‑adjacent revivalism. Smith’s early ministry context placed him within the same networks. Collins has published evidence of a 1989 confrontation involving Paul Cain, Chuck Smith, and Jack Deere, following Smith’s public exposure of Cain’s homosexuality, high-flying lifestyle, financial misconduct, and fraudulent spiritual gifts. During that meeting, Cain warned Smith that “certain things could come out”, a statement Cain himself acknowledged as “spiritual blackmail”. Smith subsequently backed down, issued a public apology, and retracted his accusations.5

John Collins links this event to the rise of "cover-up culture" within Charismatic Christianity, and he asks some very pertinent questions: "And they (the allegations) would have caused Paul Cain severe damage to his ministry, and I don't know that he really would have recovered from this. And again, look at this intersection in time. Had Paul Cain been stopped, then would there have been an IHOP KC, if not an IHOPKC, how far would the NAR have developed with its seven mountains mandate agenda?"
 
In 2004 Cain admitted to being an alcoholic and a homosexual and agreed to a process of restoration.6 

Chuck Smith's theological departures are too substantial to minimise or whitewash. His date setting, ecumenism and associations with dubious figures such as Paul Cain represent serious breaches; they are not peripheral missteps. This pattern indicates his willingness to subordinate scripture when it conflicted with his objectives.

I value Chris Quintana’s ministry and regularly listen to his verse‑by‑verse teaching on YouTube. Even so, his loyalty to Chuck Smith is misplaced and contradicts the scriptures. Calvary Chapel’s commitment to the pretribulation rapture introduces yet another significant doctrinal problem, deepening the already‑troubling theological legacy associated with Smith. Chris Quintana would be well advised to reconsider his alignment with Smith and engage honestly with the documented evidence.



Further Links

Sunday, 5 April 2026

JOE SCHIMMEL: BLESSED HOPE CHAPEL ALLEGATIONS

 The Church That Investigated Itself: An Open Letter Demanding Independent Accountability at Blessed Hope Chapel | The Berean Examiner

stigation

What We're Still Investigating

Developing

Publishing this letter is the beginning, not the conclusion. The following questions remain open. We are actively pursuing each of them.

  • Has Joe Schimmel or any member of the BHC elder board ever formally responded to the charges in this letter — privately or publicly?

  • What happened to the proceeds of the Blessed Hope Chapel land sale? Where did the funds go, and who authorized the decisions that followed?

  • Were any formal disciplinary proceedings ever initiated regarding Holly Davidson — and if so, what was the outcome and who oversaw them?

  • What role, if any, did Lisa Schimmel and Josiah play in how information about Holly's conduct was communicated — or withheld — within the family and elder structure?

  • How many families have left Blessed Hope Chapel since September 2025, and what have they been told — officially — about the reasons for the departures?

  • Is the financial picture at Good Fight Ministries — including $237,823 in undisclosed salaries and an 85% asset drop — connected to the leadership crisis now documented within the church?

If you have direct knowledge of any of these questions — including documents, communications, or firsthand accounts — we want to hear from you. All tips are confidential.

Submit a Tip

Five Formal Charges — Presented to the Elder Board

  • 1

    Selective discipline — one elder punished, another protected

  • 2

    Holly Davidson (Pastor Chad's wife; Pastor Joe's daughter) permitted conduct that removed others from the church

  • 3

    Lisa Schimmel (Pastor Joe's wife) & Josiah Schimmel (Pastor Joe's son) concealed Holly's conduct from Chad

  • 4

    Joe endorsed public deception from the pulpit

  • 5

    Congregants misled about proceeds of a church land sale

Reader's Guide

People Named in This Letter

The letter refers to several individuals by first name only. The following identifications are based on documentation held by The Berean Examiner.

  • Pastor Joe Schimmel

    Senior Pastor, Blessed Hope Chapel; founder and director of Good Fight Ministries

  • Lisa Schimmel

    Wife of Pastor Joe Schimmel. Referenced in the letter regarding her role in how information about Holly's conduct was communicated — or withheld — within the family.

  • Josiah Schimmel

    Son of Pastor Joe Schimmel. The letter raises questions about whether he, along with Lisa, withheld knowledge of Holly's conduct from her husband Chad.

  • Holly Davidson

    Daughter of Pastor Joe Schimmel; wife of Pastor Chad Davidson. According to the letter and additional documents on file with this publication, she allegedly had an inappropriate relationship with a young male congregant. The elder board is alleged to have taken no action.

  • Pastor Chad Davidson

    Elder, Blessed Hope Chapel; husband of Holly Davidson. The letter documents the congregation's concern that he was kept uninformed about his wife's conduct by her own family.

Primary Source Evidence

An Open Letter Demanding Independent Accountability

In September 2025, a group of longtime Blessed Hope Chapel members put their concerns in writing and formally delivered them to the elders. The letter was widely circulated among the congregation. Many who were aware of its contents did not sign. Those who did were precise, measured, and direct. They asked for a closed-door meeting with the elder board to formally address what they had documented.

A redacted version of the original document — preserved here as a primary source exhibit — captures not only what the congregation knew, but what they formally told leadership they knew. These are their own words, their own voice, and their own prediction. It was ignored.

September 2025
Multiple Longtime Members
Blessed Hope Chapel, Simi Valley, CA
Addressed to: Joe Schimmel, Steve Aguilar, Chad Davidson, John Heeber
Redacted — Names Protected

Primary Source — Documentary Exhibit: September 2025 Open Letter (Redacted)

Exhibit A — Page 1 of 2Click to enlarge
September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders — Page 1, redacted
Exhibit B — Page 2 of 2Click to enlarge
September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders — Page 2, redacted

Original document on file with The Berean Examiner. Certain names and identifying details have been redacted. Authenticity verified independently. Click either exhibit to view full size.

Five Explosive Elements — Annotated

1

Selective Discipline: One Elder Punished, Another Protected

Governance Failure

“The seeming hypocrisy of disciplining one elder but not another for unscriptural choices and actions, John Heeber but not Chad Davidson: John Heeber for going over the heads of Pastor Joe and the other elders in installing [redacted] pastor of the Blessed Hope Chapel satellite church of Texas without their knowledge. Chad Davidson for not confronting and dealing with blatant ongoing sin under his own roof — emotional adultery which was observed and grieved over by many of the undersigned over a long period of time.”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: This is not a private complaint — it is a formal written charge, made by the congregation to the elders, naming a specific double standarda procedural violation earned swift discipline; a sustained moral failure under an elder's own roof earned none. Chad Davidson is Joe Schimmel's son-in-law; Holly Davidson is Joe Schimmel's own daughter — and Chad's wife. The fact that conduct described as ‘blatant ongoing sin’ was observed ‘over a long period of time’ by multiple witnesses, and still went unaddressed, goes directly to Joe Schimmel's fitness for pastoral oversight. He was either unaware of what was happening in his own daughter's household — or he was aware and chose to protect her.

2

The Santa Barbara Parallel: 'Why Did Holly Get a Pass?'

Double Standard

“[Redacted] was caught in Santa Barbara with what was observed to be emotional adultery — holding the hand of a woman who was not his wife — and left the church or was asked to leave. Why did Holly get a pass and not [redacted]?”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: The congregation itself drew this parallel — in writing, formally, and delivered it to leadership. Someone was removed from the church for holding a woman's hand who was not his wife. Holly Davidson — Pastor Joe Schimmel's daughter and Pastor Chad Davidson's wife — was not removed, and is documented in this investigation to have engaged in conduct described (in a document not previously made public) by Pastor Jonathan Ball himself as ‘boundary failures’ toward a younger male congregant under her care. According to documents on file with this publication, that relationship was allegedly inappropriate in nature. The congregants are not merely venting frustration. They are presenting leadership with a direct logical contradiction and demanding an answer.

3

Lisa and Josiah Concealed Information From Chad — New Cover-Up Layer

Cover-Up Allegation

“Joe seems to be in complete denial regarding his daughter's sin. Many wonder why Lisa and Josiah kept knowledge of it from Chad!”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: This is the most significant new revelation in the entire letter. Until now, the investigation documented Joe Schimmel's role in managing and shaping the narrative — but this sentence introduces a separate layer: the congregation's belief that Lisa Schimmel (Joe's wife and Holly's mother) and Josiah Schimmel (Joe's son and Holly's brother) had knowledge of Holly's conduct and actively kept it from Holly's own husband, Chad Davidson. If true, the cover-up is not just institutional — it is familial and deliberate. A husband was allegedly kept in the dark about his wife's conduct by her own parents and sibling. The congregation noticed and documented this.

4

Joe Endorses 'Exaltation' of a Man Who Deceived Hospital Staff

Pastoral Endorsement of Deception

“It has been disclosed by one of our female evangelists who accompanied Larry Legend to his hospital ministry that he coerced her into sitting in a wheelchair in order for them to have access to the patients, knowingly deceiving hospital staff and breaking hospital rules. Joe heartily endorses Larry Legend's behavior from the pulpit. 'Exalt' is a strong endorsement. Joe's apparent only rationale is his seeming unwillingness to dampen Larry Legend's zeal.”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: This thread is entirely absent from any prior coverage of BHC. It reveals a pattern that runs throughout this investigation: Joe Schimmel's tendency to protect and promote people demonstrating zeal, regardless of their conduct. A man named Larry Legend — who coerced a woman into a wheelchair to deceive medical staff — was given not quiet tolerance but public exaltation from the pulpit. The congregation named this explicitly. ‘Exalt’ is their word, not ours — they are quoting Joe's own endorsement back to him as evidence of failed discernment.

5

The Financial Opacity: Land Sold, Promises Unkept, No Accountability

Financial Transparency

“We understood that we would diligently seek out a much smaller property with a church building in place, buy it and bank the rest of the cash. That search however was short-lived. We completely trusted Joe and Lisa which was not healthy for them nor us, them having and having had no accountability.”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: The congregation is not raising a general transparency complaint — they are describing a specific commitment made to them about the proceeds of a land sale, and documenting that it was not honored. The search for a replacement property was ‘short-lived.’ The funds' ultimate destination is unaddressed. And the congregation assigns direct responsibility: ‘We completely trusted Joe and Lisa.’ This letter, combined with this investigation's prior findings on Good Fight Ministries' 85% asset drop and the rent-free facility arrangement, establishes that financial opacity was not a perception problem. It was a congregation-documented pattern, formally put in writing.

Editorial Analysis

The Warning Was Given. In Writing. It Was Ignored.

What this letter establishes is not merely what the congregation was feeling — it is what they formally communicated, in measured and theologically careful language, to the men responsible for the church. Read the tone again: “This appeal comes without a hint of malice.” “We dearly love Joe and Lisa.” “We, the undersigned, are in no way holier than thou.” This is not a revolt. This is a last appeal. These are longtime members — people who had sat under this teaching for years, who believed in the ministry, who were trying to save it.

They predicted the outcome precisely. “We fear the result to be a split in the church, or worse, the complete dissolution of the Simi Valley church fellowship.” They demanded a closed-door meeting with the elders to address the allegations. They stated that without it, they would be forced to witness the demise of Blessed Hope Chapel and its “formerly sterling reputation.”

What the congregation put in writing — formally, carefully, and at personal risk — has never, to our knowledge, been publicly addressed by leadership. The charges stand in the record. The silence that answered them is part of the record too. We are continuing to investigate what happened next.

Written Prediction — September 2025

From the letter

“We fear the result to be a split in the church, or worse, the complete dissolution of the Simi Valley church fellowship.”

The congregation saw it coming and wrote it down — many too fearful to even sign their own names to it. According to our sources, the elders reviewed the letter. They did not act. The record is unambiguous. 

Continue Reading

Related Investigations