John MacArthur, Reformed Expositor with Tainted Legacy, Has Died
John MacArthur has been dubbed "the world's premier expository preacher" by his own organisation.1 Although he was highly revered within his own echo chamber, he was not so revered outside his collection of sycophants. MacArthur's serious theological issues and his obdurate refusal to apologize or ever admit any wrongdoing or error were extremely concerning. There are undoubtedly former members, and in all likelihood current members of GTY, who have been damaged, particularly by MacArthur's attitude towards women and children and his mishandling of abuse cases.
MacArthur has been accused of repeatedly shaming or ignoring abuse survivors and enabling abusers, leaving vulnerable women and children without support and at risk. In 2003, Hohn Cho, a lawyer and former elder at GCC, accused the church of "awful patterns" of siding with abusers and endangering victims.2 GCC's wall of silence on past and current abuse allegations is deafening!
In 2001, Eileen Gray turned to the elders of GCC for support, in a desperate attempt to protect her children from her husband, David Gray, a teacher at the church, who was physically and emotionally abusing them. Later, it emerged that he was also sexually abusing them. When Eileen refused to submit to their "advice" to return to her marriage and remove a restraining order, they wrote formal letters accusing her of ruining her family. GCC: “We strongly believe that it is time for you to remove the restraining order and return to end the separation from your husband,” they warned. “There are no longer sufficient reasons for the two of you to stay apart. We therefore are requesting that you forgive David, allow him to move back home, and once again follow his leadership as the Scripture teaches.” GCC followed up with further letters instructing her to "repent" for her failure to submit to their demands. On August 18, 2002, MacArthur announced publicly to the entire congregation of 8,000 that Eileen Gray had violated Matthew 18, that she refused to repent of her wickedness, that she was being subjected to church discipline, and that the entire church ought to essentially shun her and treat her like an unbeliever. Just four years later, in 2005, David Gray was convicted on multiple counts of sexual and physical abuse of children. He is currently serving 21 years to life for his crimes.3 Incredibly, MacArthur subsequently endorsed David Gray's "prison ministry".
MacArthur's patriarchal views went far beyond the scriptural mandate not to appoint women pastors. (1 Timothy 2:12). According to MacArthur, women shouldn't teach or publicly discuss theological issues at all! 5 Similarly, his stand against charismatic NAR false prophets and teachers was tainted by cessationism and a complete denial of any gifts of the Holy Spirit. (1 Corinthians 4:6).
And another angel, a third, followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, he also will drink the wine of God’s wrath, poured full strength into the cup of his anger, and he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever, and they have no rest, day or night, these worshipers of the beast and its image, and whoever receives the mark of its name.”(Revelation 14:9-11).
MacArthurs Masonic Connections
MacArthur never repudiated his family connection to Freemasonry; in fact, on one occasion, in 2009, he even boasted about it. During a sermon on the parable of the four soils (Mark 4:1-20), MacArthur spoke of his ministry as the “explosion of spiritual fruit and the harvest” of the ministry of his great-grandfather, Rev. Thomas Fraser Fullerton, who was the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of PEI.8
1. The Expositor | The MacArthur Center for Expository Preaching
2. Grace Community Church Rejected Elder’s Calls to ‘Do Justice’ in Abuse Case - Christianity Today
3. Navigating Grace & Truth: Addressing John MacArthur’s Legacy.
4. Former Member Sues John MacArthur’s Megachurch for Public Shaming
5. MacArthur Says Not to Speak at Events With Women, Even Though He Has
6. (272) John MacArthur Shock Claim: Take the mark of the beast and go to heaven! - YouTube
7. (272) "We are not saved by Jesus' blood!" Reaction to John MacArthur #bibleline #jmac #salvation - YouTube
8. John MacArthur’s Masonic Heritage – The Watchman Wakes
Correct me if I'm wrong - but, before His physical departure from this world, I'm absolutely positive that Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit to guide believers into all truth - I don't think He mentioned John MacArthur...
ReplyDeleteJohn MacArthur wanted others to be accountable, but he was not accountable to anyone. He had complete autonomy.
ReplyDeleteA question for you Mike –
DeleteIf it was God’s will that Christ died at Calvary for every person in the world – and scripture states in 2 Chronicles 20/6 that no one is able to withstand God – then why are there billions of people – past and present who have, and are continuing to resist God’s will?
Excellent comments Treena.
ReplyDeleteFor me Macarthur's deadliest errors were his demeaning of the Blood of Christ ( to the point where he stated in so many words " we are NOT saved by His blood") and his Calvinist gospel, which is a DIFFERENT gospel . A Christ who did not die for all of humanity is ANOTHER Christ, not the one the apostles preached. A spirit which regenerates a select group of humanity to enable them to believe and repent is ANOTHER 'holy spirit' for Christ declared the Spirit He would send would convict the WORLD of sin, which God so loved that He sent His Son to die for. He did not say "the world of the elect". That is an interpolation to fit in with a false teaching.
After leaving the errors of Pentecostalism (which also promotes ANOTHER Spirit and Christ who is supposedly in support of the manifestations of this spirit) I tried to fellowship with Reformed believers but found I could not for the reasons given above once they were fully made known to me. The warnings about those who preach another gospel are very clear. Getting some Biblical doctrines right but the basic gospel wrong is insufficient to be among the saved when we leave this world. The fact that Macarthur is so venerated as "America's theologian" etc speaks tragic volumes regarding the beliefs and discernment of many who call themselves Christians.
My best to you, Mike
Thank you Mike.. It is very puzzling that Christians revere and almost idolize MacArthur. God bless.
DeleteHi Anonymous. Treena may wish to add to this.
ReplyDeleteWe know for a fact that God wants "ALL men to repent ( and believe the gospel)" and "it is not His will that ANY should perish", so the fact that both angels and men continue to reject God illustrates that He creates beings with free wills. The passage saying no man can resist His will cannot mean that God controls the free wills of men. Salvation is a "two way street". Jesus came firstly to His own peculiar people in the Earth who had more knowledge of God than any other race but-in the main-"they received Him not ". Bur ""ALL who received Him" in any nation " became the children of God ". (John 1) He said to the Sanhedrin " you will not come to me that ye may have Life". God knew Lucifer and Adam would rebel against Him and made arrangements re the sins of both ahead of time but it was never His will or desire that they should sin. Both resisted the will of God.
So regarding the scripture you mention I speculate that it can only generally refer to the end of these long periods of probation when EVERY knee-angelic and human-will bow and confess that Chtist is Lord and that God has been just, merciful and righteous in all His dealings with his free will creates beings. Mike
Hi Mike,
ReplyDeleteEvery person is born enslaved to Sin i.e., their innate, self-ward and selfish desire to self-preserve and self-promote - this is an irrefutable fact.
The human heart is deceitful above all things. And desperately wicked (incurably sick); Who can know it? Jeremiah 17/9
What is also inarguable is the fact that every person born has been moulded, at any time in their life, by inherited mental, emotional and physical traits - over which they have had absolutely no control.
For I, the Lord, am a jealous your God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation…. Exodus 18/3
A modern-day example of inherited sin is illustrated in the way that Palestinian school children are successfully indoctrinated by parents and teachers from a very early age to denigrate, hate and kill Jews.
No one elects their parents, their gender, their physical characteristics, their upbringing or their pre-college education - all of which are essential components in the development of anyone’s adult nature.
And no person chooses the community, country, culture or religion into which they’re born - again, all essential factors in the formation of any individual’s character.
At any time in their lives each person’s character is the random product of their inherited genetics expressing themselves through their life’s cumulative experiences.
In a nutshell - each and every person is the product of creative processes over which they have had absolutely no control.
Creative processes which have moulded and determined their essential nature.
And it is their essential nature which will dictate their ‘free will’ response to the gospel of Christ.
As they say, ’One man’s meat is another man’s poison’.
There are those who would suggest that everyone is able to respond to the Gospel of Christ and, to a point, this is true, but what is much more true - is this:
Not everyone has the inherent natural ability, because of ancestry, culture and nurture to respond positively to the Gospel of Christ.
And so, it can be stated that a person’s ‘free’ will cannot contribute equitably to a person’s salvation - because a person’s ‘free’ will is the product of their essential nature and their essential nature, because of its chance origins and constituents, is not, and never can form the basis of a level, impartial and fair playing field.
Therefore, it can be said, without fear of contradiction, that the exercise of ‘free will’ in the acceptance of the Gospel is no fairer, equitable or just than the biblical doctrine of divine pre-election.
Many denounce ‘Biblical’ pre-election by labelling it as ‘Calvinist’ doctrine, but pre-election is, without doubt, Biblical and not Calvinist in its original source:
For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified, and whom He justified, these He also glorified. Romans 8/29-30.
Hi Jack. This is Treena's website. I will let her respond to this.
ReplyDeleteLet me just say that there were centuries of cultural differences between the Gentile nations "who knew not God" in the first century and yet the Gospel spread like wildfire and was soon numerically dominated by non-Jews. Despite their religious and cultural privileges the majority of Jews rejected Christ and still do,yet it was constantly offered to them again and again in that era. The moment you believe God "selects"some for salvation you make him a "respector of persons" ,which the scriptures clearly refute. Thus it is misinterpretating the doctrine of the elect of God to view it that way. This Manichean doctrine of fatalism comes from Augustine who was in that cult and obviously never quite left it. Calvin idolised Augustine who was the doctrinal father of the Catholic Church.
Trreena and I do not agree with everything taught on the following website but I think we both applaud their articles regarding Calvinism. I suggest in a friendly manner that you read them prayerfully asking God to correct you if it is needed.
https://www.discerningtheworld.com/2014/02/27/calvinism-greatest-delusion/
My best to you Treena. I leave any further comments re this topic to you! Mike
Thanks for the link Mike I am going through it now and it is very well written and thorough. I did have quite an altercation with "discerningtheworld" about the pretrib rapture a long ime ago and I have not read their posts since then. I have had a number of interactions with Jack in the past and I will not debate him again. God bless.
DeleteHi Mike,
DeleteWhere does it say (in scripture) that God wants no-one to perish? If the scripture you had in mind was 2 Peter 3/9 then you should consider that, in his letter, Peter was addressing believers and not the whole world (2Peter 1/1). Throughout my Christian life I’ve never been prompted (by the Holy Spirit) to read the works of any early Christian writers. God promised to send His Holy Spirit to counsel and lead those who would be brought to believe in Him which - in my case, I believe He has done. You refer to the Jews - as an example of those who (mindfully) reject Christ – but their rejection is not intellectually borne from their (so called ) ‘free’ will – their rejection is due to God spiritually blinding, and therefore preventing the majority of them from accepting and believing in Christ – Romans 11/7 & 2/Cor 3/14. I don’t know how relevant this is but in finishing this response the phrase ‘first to the Jew then to the Gentile’ was brought to mind……
God Bless you Treena.
I will not post any further comments on this subject Jack. Your aim appears to be to deconstruct the faith of others and I will not be facilitate it. I have already answered your question regarding 2 Peter 3:9 in a previous post where I responded to Rob Zins aberrant teaching: "He is patient toward you (ὑμᾶς, plural). (2 Peter 3:9). Zins' interpretation of this verse is that Peter directed this phrase to 'the reading community' whom he addressed as "Beloved" earlier in the chapter. (2 Peter 3:1). The question arises: Was Peter addressing this specific group of believers (in this case, predominantly Jewish believers), or was he including everyone in the world in these statements? The obvious problem with Zins' interpretation is that it makes no logical sense for God to say to "the elect" that he is not willing for any of them to perish. In other words, why would God say that He is not willing for any believers to perish if, according to Calvinism, 'the elect' cannot perish? If Peter was referring to 'repentance within salvation', it is highly unlikely that he would have used the term ἀπόλλυμι which implies 'permanent (absolute) destruction, i.e. to cancel out (remove); 'to die, with the implication of ruin and destruction' (L & N, 1, 23.106); cause to be lost (utterly perish) by experiencing a miserable end. consequences."7 Zins seems to be suggesting that "the reading community" to whom Peter was writing could perish i.e. lose their salvation. Zins' deficient interpretation is fairly typical of the reductio ad absurdum that Calvinists resort to in order to manipulate the scriptures. The orthodox non-Calvinist interpretation is that God is patient and delays judgement because he desires all men everywhere to come to a knowledge of the truth. (1 Timothy 2:4; Acts 17:30; John 3:16; 1 John 2:2). Earlier in the chapter, scoffers refer to 'the promise of His coming' when they ask, 'Where is the promise of His coming?' (2 Peter 3:4). 'His promise' in 2 Peter 3:9 refers back to, and addresses the accusation on the lips of the scoffers. In other words, these verses are not directed exclusively to the 'reading community'. The context and grammar of this passage indicate that God is patient with everyone.. not willing that any should perish. (2 Peter 3:9)." https://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2025/05/my-response-to-hardcore-calvinists-rob.html
Delete