[google28b52e0868d1e307.html]

Search This Blog

Sunday, 5 April 2026

JOE SCHIMMEL: BLESSED HOPE CHAPEL ALLEGATIONS

 The Church That Investigated Itself: An Open Letter Demanding Independent Accountability at Blessed Hope Chapel | The Berean Examiner

stigation

What We're Still Investigating

Developing

Publishing this letter is the beginning, not the conclusion. The following questions remain open. We are actively pursuing each of them.

  • Has Joe Schimmel or any member of the BHC elder board ever formally responded to the charges in this letter — privately or publicly?

  • What happened to the proceeds of the Blessed Hope Chapel land sale? Where did the funds go, and who authorized the decisions that followed?

  • Were any formal disciplinary proceedings ever initiated regarding Holly Davidson — and if so, what was the outcome and who oversaw them?

  • What role, if any, did Lisa Schimmel and Josiah play in how information about Holly's conduct was communicated — or withheld — within the family and elder structure?

  • How many families have left Blessed Hope Chapel since September 2025, and what have they been told — officially — about the reasons for the departures?

  • Is the financial picture at Good Fight Ministries — including $237,823 in undisclosed salaries and an 85% asset drop — connected to the leadership crisis now documented within the church?

If you have direct knowledge of any of these questions — including documents, communications, or firsthand accounts — we want to hear from you. All tips are confidential.

Submit a Tip

Five Formal Charges — Presented to the Elder Board

  • 1

    Selective discipline — one elder punished, another protected

  • 2

    Holly Davidson (Pastor Chad's wife; Pastor Joe's daughter) permitted conduct that removed others from the church

  • 3

    Lisa Schimmel (Pastor Joe's wife) & Josiah Schimmel (Pastor Joe's son) concealed Holly's conduct from Chad

  • 4

    Joe endorsed public deception from the pulpit

  • 5

    Congregants misled about proceeds of a church land sale

Reader's Guide

People Named in This Letter

The letter refers to several individuals by first name only. The following identifications are based on documentation held by The Berean Examiner.

  • Pastor Joe Schimmel

    Senior Pastor, Blessed Hope Chapel; founder and director of Good Fight Ministries

  • Lisa Schimmel

    Wife of Pastor Joe Schimmel. Referenced in the letter regarding her role in how information about Holly's conduct was communicated — or withheld — within the family.

  • Josiah Schimmel

    Son of Pastor Joe Schimmel. The letter raises questions about whether he, along with Lisa, withheld knowledge of Holly's conduct from her husband Chad.

  • Holly Davidson

    Daughter of Pastor Joe Schimmel; wife of Pastor Chad Davidson. According to the letter and additional documents on file with this publication, she allegedly had an inappropriate relationship with a young male congregant. The elder board is alleged to have taken no action.

  • Pastor Chad Davidson

    Elder, Blessed Hope Chapel; husband of Holly Davidson. The letter documents the congregation's concern that he was kept uninformed about his wife's conduct by her own family.

Primary Source Evidence

An Open Letter Demanding Independent Accountability

In September 2025, a group of longtime Blessed Hope Chapel members put their concerns in writing and formally delivered them to the elders. The letter was widely circulated among the congregation. Many who were aware of its contents did not sign. Those who did were precise, measured, and direct. They asked for a closed-door meeting with the elder board to formally address what they had documented.

A redacted version of the original document — preserved here as a primary source exhibit — captures not only what the congregation knew, but what they formally told leadership they knew. These are their own words, their own voice, and their own prediction. It was ignored.

September 2025
Multiple Longtime Members
Blessed Hope Chapel, Simi Valley, CA
Addressed to: Joe Schimmel, Steve Aguilar, Chad Davidson, John Heeber
Redacted — Names Protected

Primary Source — Documentary Exhibit: September 2025 Open Letter (Redacted)

Exhibit A — Page 1 of 2Click to enlarge
September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders — Page 1, redacted
Exhibit B — Page 2 of 2Click to enlarge
September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders — Page 2, redacted

Original document on file with The Berean Examiner. Certain names and identifying details have been redacted. Authenticity verified independently. Click either exhibit to view full size.

Five Explosive Elements — Annotated

1

Selective Discipline: One Elder Punished, Another Protected

Governance Failure

“The seeming hypocrisy of disciplining one elder but not another for unscriptural choices and actions, John Heeber but not Chad Davidson: John Heeber for going over the heads of Pastor Joe and the other elders in installing [redacted] pastor of the Blessed Hope Chapel satellite church of Texas without their knowledge. Chad Davidson for not confronting and dealing with blatant ongoing sin under his own roof — emotional adultery which was observed and grieved over by many of the undersigned over a long period of time.”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: This is not a private complaint — it is a formal written charge, made by the congregation to the elders, naming a specific double standarda procedural violation earned swift discipline; a sustained moral failure under an elder's own roof earned none. Chad Davidson is Joe Schimmel's son-in-law; Holly Davidson is Joe Schimmel's own daughter — and Chad's wife. The fact that conduct described as ‘blatant ongoing sin’ was observed ‘over a long period of time’ by multiple witnesses, and still went unaddressed, goes directly to Joe Schimmel's fitness for pastoral oversight. He was either unaware of what was happening in his own daughter's household — or he was aware and chose to protect her.

2

The Santa Barbara Parallel: 'Why Did Holly Get a Pass?'

Double Standard

“[Redacted] was caught in Santa Barbara with what was observed to be emotional adultery — holding the hand of a woman who was not his wife — and left the church or was asked to leave. Why did Holly get a pass and not [redacted]?”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: The congregation itself drew this parallel — in writing, formally, and delivered it to leadership. Someone was removed from the church for holding a woman's hand who was not his wife. Holly Davidson — Pastor Joe Schimmel's daughter and Pastor Chad Davidson's wife — was not removed, and is documented in this investigation to have engaged in conduct described (in a document not previously made public) by Pastor Jonathan Ball himself as ‘boundary failures’ toward a younger male congregant under her care. According to documents on file with this publication, that relationship was allegedly inappropriate in nature. The congregants are not merely venting frustration. They are presenting leadership with a direct logical contradiction and demanding an answer.

3

Lisa and Josiah Concealed Information From Chad — New Cover-Up Layer

Cover-Up Allegation

“Joe seems to be in complete denial regarding his daughter's sin. Many wonder why Lisa and Josiah kept knowledge of it from Chad!”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: This is the most significant new revelation in the entire letter. Until now, the investigation documented Joe Schimmel's role in managing and shaping the narrative — but this sentence introduces a separate layer: the congregation's belief that Lisa Schimmel (Joe's wife and Holly's mother) and Josiah Schimmel (Joe's son and Holly's brother) had knowledge of Holly's conduct and actively kept it from Holly's own husband, Chad Davidson. If true, the cover-up is not just institutional — it is familial and deliberate. A husband was allegedly kept in the dark about his wife's conduct by her own parents and sibling. The congregation noticed and documented this.

4

Joe Endorses 'Exaltation' of a Man Who Deceived Hospital Staff

Pastoral Endorsement of Deception

“It has been disclosed by one of our female evangelists who accompanied Larry Legend to his hospital ministry that he coerced her into sitting in a wheelchair in order for them to have access to the patients, knowingly deceiving hospital staff and breaking hospital rules. Joe heartily endorses Larry Legend's behavior from the pulpit. 'Exalt' is a strong endorsement. Joe's apparent only rationale is his seeming unwillingness to dampen Larry Legend's zeal.”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: This thread is entirely absent from any prior coverage of BHC. It reveals a pattern that runs throughout this investigation: Joe Schimmel's tendency to protect and promote people demonstrating zeal, regardless of their conduct. A man named Larry Legend — who coerced a woman into a wheelchair to deceive medical staff — was given not quiet tolerance but public exaltation from the pulpit. The congregation named this explicitly. ‘Exalt’ is their word, not ours — they are quoting Joe's own endorsement back to him as evidence of failed discernment.

5

The Financial Opacity: Land Sold, Promises Unkept, No Accountability

Financial Transparency

“We understood that we would diligently seek out a much smaller property with a church building in place, buy it and bank the rest of the cash. That search however was short-lived. We completely trusted Joe and Lisa which was not healthy for them nor us, them having and having had no accountability.”

— September 2025 Open Letter to BHC Elders

Editorial note: The congregation is not raising a general transparency complaint — they are describing a specific commitment made to them about the proceeds of a land sale, and documenting that it was not honored. The search for a replacement property was ‘short-lived.’ The funds' ultimate destination is unaddressed. And the congregation assigns direct responsibility: ‘We completely trusted Joe and Lisa.’ This letter, combined with this investigation's prior findings on Good Fight Ministries' 85% asset drop and the rent-free facility arrangement, establishes that financial opacity was not a perception problem. It was a congregation-documented pattern, formally put in writing.

Editorial Analysis

The Warning Was Given. In Writing. It Was Ignored.

What this letter establishes is not merely what the congregation was feeling — it is what they formally communicated, in measured and theologically careful language, to the men responsible for the church. Read the tone again: “This appeal comes without a hint of malice.” “We dearly love Joe and Lisa.” “We, the undersigned, are in no way holier than thou.” This is not a revolt. This is a last appeal. These are longtime members — people who had sat under this teaching for years, who believed in the ministry, who were trying to save it.

They predicted the outcome precisely. “We fear the result to be a split in the church, or worse, the complete dissolution of the Simi Valley church fellowship.” They demanded a closed-door meeting with the elders to address the allegations. They stated that without it, they would be forced to witness the demise of Blessed Hope Chapel and its “formerly sterling reputation.”

What the congregation put in writing — formally, carefully, and at personal risk — has never, to our knowledge, been publicly addressed by leadership. The charges stand in the record. The silence that answered them is part of the record too. We are continuing to investigate what happened next.

Written Prediction — September 2025

From the letter

“We fear the result to be a split in the church, or worse, the complete dissolution of the Simi Valley church fellowship.”

The congregation saw it coming and wrote it down — many too fearful to even sign their own names to it. According to our sources, the elders reviewed the letter. They did not act. The record is unambiguous. 

Continue Reading

Related Investigations

Friday, 3 April 2026

NELSON WALTERS' RECKLESS DISTORTION OF DANIEL 11


Is the US Navy About to Be Destroyed? What Prophecy Says,

Nelson Walters' "The US Navy is anchored around the Strait of Hormuz. Prophecy tells us that the Western navies and the USA Navy will be destroyed, but is this the time? ..Before they are destroyed, the US Navy does something that sets the prophetic clock in motion. It enrages the Antichrist so completely that he abandons his military campaign, storms into Jerusalem and sits in the temple declaring himself that he is God.. The US Navy does that? Where is that found? The answer is in Daniel 11:30. Western ships, navy forces, including the United States Navy, block the Antichrist and force him to back down, and that is the trigger for the abomination of desolation, and that is the trigger for the flight of Israel on Passover, and that is the trigger for the destruction of the US Navy."


At the time appointed he shall return and come into the south, but it shall not be this time as it was before. For ships of Kittim shall come against him, and he shall be afraid and withdraw, and shall turn back and be enraged and take action against the holy covenant. He shall turn back and pay attention to those who forsake the holy covenant. Forces from him shall appear and profane the temple and fortress, and shall take away the regular burnt offering. And they shall set up the abomination that makes desolate..(Daniel 11:29-31 cf. Isaiah 46:9-10))

And the king shall do as he wills. He shall exalt himself and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak astonishing things against the God of gods. He shall prosper till the indignation is accomplished; for what is decreed shall be done. He shall pay no attention to the gods of his fathers, or to the one beloved by women. He shall not pay attention to any other god, for he shall magnify himself above all. He shall honor the god of fortresses instead of these. A god whom his fathers did not know he shall honor with gold and silver, with precious stones and costly gifts. He shall deal with the strongest fortresses with the help of a foreign god. Those who acknowledge him he shall load with honor. He shall make them rulers over many and shall divide the land for a price.
At the time of the end, the king of the south shall attack him, but the king of the north shall rush upon him like a whirlwind, with chariots and horsemen, and with many ships. And he shall come into countries and shall overflow and pass through. He shall come into the glorious land. And tens of thousands shall fall, but these shall be delivered out of his hand: Edom and Moab and the main part of the Ammonites. He shall stretch out his hand against the countries, and the land of Egypt shall not escape. He shall become ruler of the treasures of gold and of silver, and all the precious things of Egypt, and the Libyans and the Cushites shall follow in his train. But news from the east and the north shall alarm him, and he shall go out with great fury to destroy and devote many to destruction. And he shall pitch his palatial tents between the sea and the glorious holy mountain. Yet he shall come to his end, with none to help him. (Daniel 11:36-45).

The king of the North is traditionally understood to be the Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The "South" refers to Egypt, ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty. The term "Kittim" historically refers to the people of Cyprus and, by extension, the western maritime powers. In the context of Daniel 11, it likely represents Roman forces. This phrase indicates a military intervention by a powerful naval force, which historically aligns with Roman intervention in the region. The "ships of Kittim" symbolise a formidable opposition that disrupts the plans of Antiochus IV. This intervention is a turning point, as it halts his campaign against Egypt.

Many interpreters argue that Daniel 11:36–45 shifts from describing Antiochus IV to focus on the Antichrist, claiming that the text introduces a new figure whose arrogance and blasphemy exceed those of all previous rulers. My hesitation is the closing statement, “he shall come to his end with none to help him”, which reads more like a historical reference to Antiochus’ death rather than an eschatological conclusion about the Antichrist. 

Walters connects Daniel 11 with Balaam’s fourth oracle in Numbers 24:15–19, and identifies Agag with Gog.* While Gog and Agag share thematic links as archetypal enemies, there is no reason to connect either passage with modern geopolitical events.

ASV: Water will flow from his buckets, and his seed will have abundant water. His king will be greater than Agag, and his kingdom will be exalted. (Numbers 24:7)

Septuagint: There shall come a man out of his seed, and he shall rule over many nations; and the kingdom of Gog shall be exalted, and his kingdom shall be increased.

Walters refers to Gog as "the last great enemy of God's people, the final tyrant, the Antichrist himself". The bible never explicitly identifies Gog as the Antichrist. This is a much-debated subject; some interpreters equate the two figures, while others see them as distinct. In Ezekiel 39, Gog falls on the mountains of Israel and is devoured by birds of prey. However, Revelation 19:20 records that the Antichrist and the false prophet are thrown alive into the lake of fire. (Revelation 19:20). This settles the matter; the Gog of Ezekiel 38-39 is not the Antichrist as some allege.

You shall fall on the mountains of Israel, you and all your hordes and the peoples who are with you. I will give you to birds of prey of every sort and to the beasts of the field to be devoured. (Ezekiel 39:4).


I hold the minority view that the battle of Ezekiel 38 and 39 will take place at the end of the millennium, as outlined in Revelation 20, where Gog is specifically named. Similarities between Revelation 19 and 20 suggest the possibility of a typological prefiguration of the Gog-Magog War at Armageddon, which explains why some argue for the Armageddon-Gog view. Others argue that the Gog-Magog war will happen during the brief covenant between Israel and the Antichrist, which represents a deceptive false peace at the beginning of the 70th week. However, this view is difficult to sustain if we follow the pattern of Daniel 11:36 ff. The Antichrist is unassailable after the covenant with Israel is made; it is therefore doubtful that Israel will be attacked while under the Antichrist’s protection. (Daniel 9:27). Advocates of a pre‑seventieth‑week Gog war consistently overlook Ezekiel’s explicit description of Israel “dwelling securely… in unwalled villages, without walls, and having no bars or gates” (Ezekiel 38:11, 14). That condition bears no resemblance to the present geopolitical landscape, nor does it align with any other pre‑70th‑week Gog scenario. The text itself rules such speculation out.

Walters goes on to speculate about the "ships of Kittim" in Numbers 24:24. This verse does not specify when the aggressor is destroyed. It simply declares that the Western power, symbolised by the ships of Kittim, will ultimately fall under God’s judgment at the end of the age.

But ships shall come from Kittim and shall afflict Asshur and Eber; and he too shall come to utter destruction. (Numbers 24:24).

Ellicott: "The western power that afflicts Asshur and Eber is the one God brings to its end."
Benson: "The Grecian and Roman empires — the scourge of Asshur and Eber — are the ones God causes to perish."
Gill: "The destroyer of Asshur and Eber “shall perish for ever,” ultimately by the hand of the Messiah.
Keil & Delitzsch: "The final overthrow of this western power is part of God’s end‑time judgment."2

Walters attempts, but fails to manufacture an additional prophecy from the Dead Sea Scrolls by appealing to Joel 2:20, claiming that the Scrolls refer to a king titled “the king of the grasshoppers”, whom he equates with Gog. This construction collapses immediately. Joel 2 contains no reference to any king, and no such title appears anywhere in the Dead Sea Scrolls. The “northerner” in Joel 2 describes a historical threat from an invading northern army—typically linked to Assyrian or Babylonian forces—and functions as a precursor to eschatological judgement, the Day of the Lord, following the tribulation. Walters’ proposed title has no textual foundation in either source and can be dismissed outright. Walters then links this invented "king of the grasshoppers" with Abaddon, the leader of the abyss forces in Revelation 9:11, associated with the fifth‑trumpet judgement, the first woe. The locust army of Revelation 9:7–10 represents a demonic host. Abaddon/Apollyon (destroyer) and Gog are never identified with one another in the biblical text; they are entirely separate figures with distinct roles, contexts, and literary functions.

DSS: But I will remove the northern army far away from you,
and will drive it into a barren and desolate land,
its front into the eastern sea,
and its back into the western sea;
and its stench will come up,
and its bad smell will rise.”
Surely he has done great things.
3


ESV: I will remove the northerner far from you, and drive him into a parched and desolate land, his vanguard into the eastern sea, and his rear guard into the western sea; the stench and foul smell of him will rise, for he has done great things. (Joel 2:20).

There is little value in pursuing further critique of Walters’ reckless speculations. His proposed 2028 date for the abomination of desolation is simply another instance of baseless date‑setting and should be rejected outright. Daniel’s seventieth week requires two observable markers: a covenant between Israel and the Antichrist, and the reinstatement of Mosaic sacrifices. (Daniel 9:27). Neither of these conditions presently exists. Walters' handling of scripture is consistently unreliable, culminating in a fabricated claim about a fictional "king of the grasshoppers” in Joel 2:20 allegedly found in the Dead Sea Scrolls—no such reference exists. Eschatological events cannot be stitched together haphazardly or forced onto current geopolitical tensions, including the situation with the ships near the Strait of Hormuz. We should bear in mind that the ten-king confederacy must exist before the seventieth week of Daniel and the appearance of the Antichrist. (Daniel 7:24). Furthermore, the present conflict between Israel‑America and Iran does not involve the full coalition described in Ezekiel 38–39—notably Turkey, Ethiopia, and Libya are absent. Walters’ approach reflects a pattern of mishandling scripture and promoting spurious claims without any exegetical basis. He fits the profile of a false teacher who, according to Romans 16:17–18, should be marked and avoided.

*The reference to the king being “higher than Agag” symbolizes victory over adversaries, as Agag was a notable king of the Amalekites, representing a formidable enemy. This imagery conveys that Israel’s king and kingdom will be exalted above opposition, ensuring protection, honor, and success.
Agag is often associated with Gog in biblical texts. In the Book of Ezekiel, Gog is described as the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and in the Book of Esther, Haman, who was an enemy of the Jews, is referred to as an "Agagite," which connects him to the Amalekites, the descendants of Agag. Additionally, the Septuagint (an ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible) equates the terms Agag and Gog, further linking them in biblical prophecy. Thus, Agag and Gog are indeed related in biblical contexts.

Further Links