Is Being ‘Slain in the Spirit’ Really from the Lord? (youtube.com)
Below: New Apostolic Reformation proponent Michael Brown's devious response to the question of whether the phenomenon of "slain in the Spirit" is from the Lord:
Where is it spoken against in the bible?Where does God warn against it?
Where does scripture say this is something we should avoid?
We use the Word of God according to the Word of God, not according to your standard or mine, but according to the Word of God.
Does (slain in the Spirit) lead them to Jesus, does it lead them to the truth, does it lead them to the Word, does it lead them to holiness?
Many have witnessed the antics, the fakery, and the abominations of false teachers like Todd Bentley, Benny Hinn, Bill Johnson, Mike Bickle, Todd White etc. Their teachings and lifestyles are disqualifying traits and a denial of the faith. (2 Timothy 3:8; Colossians 2:18). The scriptures instruct believers to mark and avoid those who teach things contrary to the scriptures. (Romans 16:17). Should we believe anecdotal evidence from Brown and other NAR leaders about this experience? Michael Brown has already demonstrated to the world that he is far too busy "fulfilling God's calling" and providing cover for his friends to care about believers! (Acts 20:21).1
Arguments from scriptural silence
Brown's assumption that whatever is not expressly forbidden in the scriptures is allowed is yet another one of his devious attempts to obscure the scriptures. To reject NAR false teachers and any phenomena associated with them is to practice spiritual discernment. Arguments from scriptural silence are by their very nature unsound. If we operate on the premise of scriptural silence, we are free to approve of any practice we care to devise. The result is that literally anything goes and all kinds of disorderly and corrupt conduct arises. (1 Corinthians 14:40; Colossians 2:5).
Several Old Testament passages demonstrate the folly of deviating from the scriptures: e.g. Nahab and Abihu and the strange fire incident (Leviticus 10:1). When David brought the ark from Kiriath-Jearim he said "If it seems good to you and from the LORD our God." The specific instruction for transporting the ark given to Moses was that it was to be carried by the Levitical priests. (Exodus 25:10-15). However, David transported the ark on a cart, and when the oxen stumbled, Uziah put out his hand to take hold of the ark and the Lord's anger was kindled. (1 Chronicles 13:7-10). King David's willful act of taking a census was incited by Satan. (1 Chronicles 21:1-7). A census of the Israelites was to be taken only when God specifically commanded it to be done. (Numbers 1:1-2,4:2,26:2-4). God condemned the illicit high places erected by the people of Judah: And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, nor did it come into my mind. (Jeremiah 7:31).
Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers. (1 Timothy 4:16 cf. Exodus 23:13; 1 Corinthians 4:6).
Brown quoted the response of Puritan theologian and philosopher Jonathan Edwards to his critics during the "Great Awakening" in the 1730s and 1740s. Edwards: "We ought not to limit God where he hath not limited Himself."2 Brown's snapshot of Jonathan Edwards is misleading. Edwards did not class various manifestations (bodily effects) as distinguishing marks of the Holy Spirit one way or the other. Edwards was a very controversial character who eventually lost the confidence of his own congregation. Because false revivals are often accompanied by unusual phenomena not found in the scriptures, those leading them are unreliable witnesses.
Wikipedia: "The movement met with opposition from conservative Congregationalist ministers. In 1741, Edwards published in the defense of revivals The Distinguishing Marks of a Work of the Spirit of God, dealing particularly with the phenomena most criticized: the swoonings, outcries, and convulsions. These "bodily effects", he insisted, were not distinguishing marks of the work of the Spirit of God one way or another. So bitter was the feeling against the revival in some churches that in 1742 he felt moved to write a second apology, Thoughts on the Revival in New England, where his main argument concerned the great moral improvement of the country. In the same pamphlet he defends an appeal to the emotions and advocates preaching terror when necessary, even to children, who in God's sight 'are young vipers... if not Christ's.'"3
1. A Friendly Challenge to My Critics (youtube.com)
2. Edwards - The Distinguishing Marks of a Work of the Spirit of God (monergism.com)
3. Jonathan Edwards (theologian) - Wikipedia
Further Links
The Silence of the Scriptures: Permissive or Prohibitive? | Christian CourierAn Introduction to Bible Silence (insearchoftruth.org)
If Brown is not a NARpostle, then what was he ‘imparting’ to NARpostle Katherine Ruonala? (churchwatchcentral.com)Search Results for “Michael Brown” – ChurchWatch Central
Cannot understand these behaviours as they seem the opposite of being holy and reverend
ReplyDeleteHi Treena. Interesting re Edwards. I had heard that strange manifestations ended his "revival" which was quite limited in its appeal to the unsaved as he was a Calvinist. He has been quoted on the subject of Infant Damnation which seems to tie in with his comment on children. Calvinism is a DIFFERENT gospel so if he led anyone truly to Christ it was in spite of his gross errors.
ReplyDeleteWhen I came out of Pentecostalism I found videos online showing people lining up and falling over after a touch made to their foreheads in Hindu ashrams and in Qui Gong gatherings. People also acted drunk and laughed uncontrollably in the pagan services. Voodoo practitioners speak in gibberish after they say "fallen angels possess them". Zulus too and Wiccans. No need to investigate further! When these things happened in so-called church services in the last century it was not as easy to research and see its pagan roots. Now people like Dr Brown (who also conducts fire tunnels and allows others to introduce him as an Apostle) have no excuse. They are wilfully operating with familiar spirits. I have no time for him as the faux apologist and voice of reason for charismania.
Jerry Savelle has just died. A cohort of Copeland who I saw in one video being "confirmed as an Apostle "by his mentor. Copeland also officially dubbed Andrew Wommack as a prophet. They are all going the way of Hagin and Kenyon and if they do not repent they will find their immense wealth and jets and their Prosperity-promoting Christ have done them no eternal good.
My best to you, Mike
Thank you Mike.
ReplyDeleteIt is amazing to me that Brown and other NAR leaders have no fear of the Lord or any thought about the consequences of their false teaching.
God bless.