[google28b52e0868d1e307.html]

Search This Blog

Sunday, 21 April 2019

JACOB PRASCH FAKE JEW!

No one who practices deceit shall dwell in my house; no one who utters lies shall continue before my eyes. (Psalm 101:7).

I now regard Jacob Prasch as a fake and a liar in every single respect. He is certainly a fake Christian, but now it appears that he is also a fake Jew!

I began my research into Jacob Prasch in 2016 when I questioned his fake intra-seal rapture teaching. I soon discovered that intra-seal contained many troubling errors. Since then I have written a number of posts on the subject. I have also questioned Prasch's relationship with ecumenists David Noakes and Clifford Hill of Issachar Ministries, {1} and recently his approval of Jackie Alnor's article endorsing Freemason Billy Graham as a valid evangelist. {2} Prasch's feigned ignorance of the true identity of John Cambridge also raised a few eyebrows. {3} Some of Prasch's associations are very puzzling indeed for someone claiming to be a solid bible expositor. One way or another, many things about Jacob Prasch do not add up. In September 2016, I came to the following conclusion: "Prasch's casuistry and equivocation, are, dare I say it, almost Jesuitical. I have come to the point where I would not take anything he says at face value." {4}

Since the David Nathan episode last year, more questions about Prasch's true motives have come into question. In particular the destructive antichristian venom that he often directs towards others has been highlighted. Many Christians have suffered at the hands of Prasch and his abusive rages over the years, and true to type, Prasch has also abused me with his often repeated "Jezebel" slur. In recent months, Prasch's deception has been exposed on a regular basis. In particular, Frank Rogers' videos on YouTube identify some explicit issues! {5}

Inexplicably, Prasch retains the support of the CMFI {6} and people like Marco Quintana, John Haller, Joshua Chavez and Amos Farrell. Bill Randles association with Moriel is at an end, although he still persists in slandering David Nathan. These Prashites are the so called "leaders" that have oversight and influence over a significant part of the remnant church in these perilous times! (2 Timothy 3:1).

moriel.org: "Jacob’s family is a combination of Roman Catholic and Jewish. (In his youth he was forced to attend a Catholic school, but also attended the Jewish Community Center."{7}

Prasch: "I have two first names - James and Jacob. When I was a baby they called me James. It was Anglicised from my grandfathers name, Ya'kov - Jacob. It is good that I have two first names because my family is a combination of two backgrounds - Irish Catholic and Jewish." {8} On ancestry.co.uk Prasch's grandfather on his father's side is George Conrad Prasch, and on his mother's side it is Francis Joseph Connors. https://vimeo.com/330059149 (password Ancestry)

In the clip below Prasch claims that he is "fluent in Hebrew", after confirming his family's background as Jewish and Roman Catholic:
vimeo.com/331578527 (password Hebrew)

Prasch's most recent books state that he has a Jewish background:
vimeo.com/331564900 (password Shadows)

Prasch's repeated claim of having a Jewish background has now been thrown into serious doubt.
The record lists Prasch's father as James Aloysius Prasch 1926-1988 from New Jersey USA.

There is no indication in the record that he was Jewish. Indeed the Prasch gravestone is situated in a Catholic graveyard complete with masonic symbol.
vimeo.com/330059149 (password Ancestry)













Above: Prasch's uncle on his father's side - John Gilbert Prasch.
A Freemason and definitely not Jewish!
























































Someone going by the name of Truth Dispenser left the following comment on Frank Rogers' recent video. I am informed that these details come from inside the Prasch camp and concern a cover up by Moriel staff:

"Despite what he claims, people very close to Prasch have covered his deceit for years because James (Jimmy) A. Prasch comes from a Catholic family with no Jewish blood.
Both parents were catholic going back many generations.
Prasch is not a Jewish surname and his dad who was a New York cop was buried in St Mary's catholic cemetery. In fact, Prasch is named after his dad and BOTH have the same middle name of Aloysius after the catholic saint of the same name.
His dad's memorial stone also shows his older brother's name and has the sign of The Cross and the Freemason's compasses on it.
The New Jersey synagogues have no record of a catholic boy of that name converting to Judaism or receiving his bar mitzvah.
This will come as a shock to the many people who followed Prasch, because they thought he was Jewish. When he first began the charade many years ago, he called himself Yacov - and many still call him that in England.
When he was challenged about it, he then changed his name to Jacob, which most people now call him, but his family and old friends continue to call him by his real name of Jimmy.
Yes, he married a Jewish girl he met in Israel. Yes, they lived in Galilee and yes, he has learned some Hebrew and Yiddish.
But that's as far as it goes."
{9}

Anonymous left comment on my blog on the 12th of April:

"Another question that is really not asked is does James (Jimmy) Prasch truly have Jewish ancestry in his family?
Jacobs mother was a faithful Roman Catholic and his father James Prasch SR was of no apparent faith at all.
Jimmy's mom and dad would have been married in a Roman Catholic Church and a priest back in those days would never have married a Roman Catholic to a Jewish man.
Now James wife Pavia is for sure Jewish so maybe after James married Pavia he adopted the Jewish faith and then eventually both James and Pavia would convert to Christianity.
Jacobs real name is listed here on his mom's obituary.
Maureen A. Prasch (Nee:Connors)
Lakewood - Maureen A. Prasch (Nee:Connors); 86, passed away peacefully on Saturday, April 28th at the Center for Hope Hospice in Elizabeth, NJ, surrounded by her loving family.
Maureen was born and raised in Bayonne, NJ. She moved to Highlands, NJ where she lived until her retirement in 1989. Before eventually settling in Lakewood, NJ, she spent her early retired years extensively travelling the U.S. and lived briefly on Whidbey Island in Washington State, and in Venice, Hollywood Beach and West Palm Beach, FL.
She was a retired Scheduler for NY and NJ Port Authority for over 21 years. She loved New York City and spent much of her free time there enjoying it. She was a patriotic American who bore a deep love for her Irish heritage. She travelled to Ireland many times and was an avid fan of its music, dance and literary culture.
Beloved Mother of James A. Prasch, Jr., Theresa Prasch Ward, Robert C. Prasch, & Sandra O'Connor Carey. Devoted Grandmother of Beth Miel, Eli Prasch, Kieran Prasch, Ashlyn Ward & Rhiannon O'Connor. Adoring Great-Grandmother of Joshua Miel. Loving Sister of Catherine Connors and the late Michael, Charles, Brian, Francis, and Cornelius Connors, Theresa Boyle, Anne Halecki, and Margaret Carstens. Dear Sister-In-Law of Peter Halecki. She is also survived by many Nieces & Nephews.
Relatives and friends are invited to attend the Viewing on Wednesday, May 2nd from
4 - 8 PM at the G. Keenen O'Brien Funeral Home, 984 Avenue C, Bayonne. A Funeral Mass will be offered on Thursday, May 3rd at 11 AM at St. Vincent's Church. Private Cremation.
Published in Asbury Park Press on May 1, 2018
So Jacob maybe adopted the name Jacob so he could be called Yacov and sell himself as a Jewish American teacher?
Again keeping in mind his wife Pavia is very smart and teaches Hebrew and Mathematics in the UK where Jimmy still lives.
Jimmy is a citizen of the UK not of American and has no American address unless you include David Listers address where Jimmy will stay on occasion.
Interesting the bag of goods people have been sold for decades.
Jimmy has always been an angry person.

I hope he gets better "

Prasch has falsely linked his ancestral name with Pharisee. {10} Wikipedia: "The Pharisee ("separatist") party emerged largely out of the group of scribes and sages. Their name comes from the Hebrew and Aramaic parush or parushi, which means 'one who is separated.'" {11} However, my research has revealed no connection between the name parush/parushi and Prasch. This is another piece of Prasch's fiction! The origin of Prasch is unknown - the name is most prevalent in the USA, Germany and Austria. {12}

The name on Prasch's birth certificate is James Aloysius Prasch. The alumni roll from St Mary’s Star of The Sea Roman Catholic School in Prasch's home town of Bayonne, New Jersey confirms his name on the second column near the end of 1967. "Aloysius is a French baby name. In French the meaning of the name Aloysius is: Famous warrior, from the Old German 'Chlodovech'. Aloysius is the name of the Italian Saint Aloysius of Gonzaga, and common among British Roman Catholics." {13} "Saint Aloysius de Gonzaga, SJ (Italian: Luigi Gonzaga; 9 March 1568 – 21 June 1591) was an Italian aristocrat who became a member of the Society of Jesus." {14} I am sure that many are aware, the Society of Jesus are the Jesuits.

Despite his questionable claim of Jewish descent, I fear that Prasch is no true friend of the Jewish people at all! Is this the reason for Prasch's vicious attack on Messianic Jew, David Nathan (Bread of Life Ministries), after David announced that he was leaving Moriel Ministries, and consequently Prasch's sphere of influence? 

I find some interesting parallels between Jacob Prasch and Haman (Hebrew: המן‎ Hâmân; also known as Haman the Agagite or Haman the evil). Haman, was the main antagonist in the Book of Esther and a descendant of Agag, the Nephilim king of the Amalekites, the bitterest enemies of the Jews. (1 Samuel 15:8). Haman's hatred of the Jews qualifies him as a type of the Antichrist. Ironically, Haman means to rage, be turbulent. Strong's 2001a {15}

Then Harbona, one of the eunuchs in attendance on the king, said, “Moreover, the gallows that Haman has prepared for Mordecai, whose word saved the king, is standing at Haman’s house, fifty cubits high.” And the king said, “Hang him on that.” (Esther 7:9).

In Susa the citadel itself the Jews killed and destroyed 500 men, and also killed Parshandatha and Dalphon and Aspatha and Poratha and Adalia and Aridatha and Parmashta and Arisai and Aridai and Vaizatha, the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, but they laid no hand on the plunder. (Esther 9:6-10).


Will Jacob Prasch finally be hoisted with his own petard?

The LORD watches over the sojourners; he upholds the widow and the fatherless, but the way of the wicked he brings to ruin. (Psalm 146:9).

1. https://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2018/09/jacob-prasch-david-noakes-moriel.html
2. http://christiansentinel.com/2018/02/22/legacy-billy-graham/
3. https://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2018/12/jacob-prasch-moriel-ministries-who-is.html
4. https://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2016/09/jacob-prasch-moriel-ministries-further.html
5. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0AyZLfWyyB9XXdZR-ODXNA
6. https://www.moriel.org/articles-and-news/7157-statement-of-cmfi-concerning-moriel,-april-2019.html
7. https://www.moriel.org/about/19-general/5992-about-jacob-prasch.html 
8. Jacob Prasch: Israel, The Church & The Jews 2008 page 263
9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hmml7O2_zAc&app=desktop
10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p5RuQKlfjA&app=desktop
11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
12. http://www.namespedia.com/details/Prasch
13. https://www.sheknows.com/baby-names/name/aloysius/
14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloysius_Gonzaga
15. https://biblehub.com/hebrew/2001a.htm

22 comments:

  1. So many things are coming to the light in this. One thing that keeps surfacing for me, and you mentioned it in this post, is that David Nathan was planning to leave Moriel before all of this happened. I asked Mr. Nathan if that was true, and he confirmed it.

    So many things wrong coming to light, but also the fact that Prasch's books have no references. Is that true for all of them? I've only checked into a few. Also, I have read old emails of his when he's blasting other people. The spelling and grammar in those emails is atrocious. How can someone so well-versed and educated write so poorly? Was he in such a blind rage, that he couldn't think or spell clearly? Was he intoxicated? I blindly followed Prasch's teachings for years. I am saddened by this whole affair.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is true that no Moriel books have references.
    As far as the Prasch family as I look at the headstone it could have been that Jimmy's father's brother was a Mason. Most Roman Catholics back in the day would not have been Masons but rather Knights of Columbus.
    From the looks of it Mrs Prasch was a devout Roman Catholic.
    The only way she could have married a Jew would have been to get a dispensation from the local bishop of Mrs Prasch's diocese.
    And in the 50s in New York I doubt that would have ever been granted under any circumstance.
    The Prasch's without the dispensation would not have been married in the church because marriage is considered a Holy Sacrament.
    A Roman Catholic marrying a Jew would have been excommunicated and not allowed to go to Mass or take communion. Let alone be buried in a Catholic cemetery.
    As far as anyone saying they have been dipped and clipped as Prask states many times.
    In the 50's most males were circumcised for health purposes.
    Still a common practice for most male babies.
    If a Brit Milah (bris) happened with Jimmy a record would have been kept by the rabbi of the local synagogue much like a baptismal certificate.


    ReplyDelete
  3. I have three of Prasch's books: 'Shadows of the Beast', 'Israel the Church & the Jews' and 'More Grain for the Famine'. There are no references in these three, so I think it is safe to assume that none of his books have references.

    There were onerous conditions imposed by the RC Church upon non-Catholic partners in “mixed” marriages prior to Vatican II. I agree with your assessment Anonymous.

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shadows of the Beast finished Prasch off for me. The errors are multitudinous-this book if it was proof-read at all was done so by an eight year old!

    Spelling mistakes and other errors apart, Prasch slights the Reformation, I quote from page 32:

    "The Protestants pretended they rediscovered the Gospel, but in fact there were people more doctrinally sound than the Protestants who had never lost it to begin with."

    What are we to make of this nonsense? Would Prasch rather Luther never entered on the scene? Would he rather that we were all still under the yoke of Rome? It seems that way to me!

    I don't believe Luther and the other Reformers "pretended" at anything, do you? No! they were men of great conviction, many were burnt at the stake because they wouldn't bend the knee to the pope (that is not to say that they understood everything aright, for they came out of very great darkness, many previously being Roman Catholic Priests!). The Reformers STARTED the Reformation, it is an ONGOING movement, though now spluttering very badly and about to stall!

    As B.W.Newton said; "It is a very great sin to speak lightly of the Reformation."

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Protestants did not "pretend they rediscovered the Gospel".. they actually DID rediscover the Gospel. The introduction of justification by grace alone, through faith alone was the foundation of the Protestant Reformation.

    Thank you Colin.

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If Bill Randles has distanced Jacob and Moriel why does he still have links on his website which sends the wrong message? http://www.believersingrace.com/links.html and here: http://www.believersingracevideos.com/Speakers/

    ReplyDelete
  7. You will have to ask Bill Randles that question Anonymous.

    Bill Randles has stated: "I am not Moriel, I do not support Moriel anymore (for many reasons) and do not wish to be wrongly associated with the very same things I critiqued Moriel for.."
    https://bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2019/04/closingstages-bill-randles-re-jacob.html

    God bless

    ReplyDelete
  8. In this day and age one is very foolish to fabricate one's past and think they will avoid detection.
    The unfortunate aftermath of all this will be that discernment ministries in general will be tarnished by this fraudulent example and some of the false teachers which Prasch accurately exposed may discredit his valid arguments against their teaching and practices.
    Some in this category who are genuinely deceived and deceiving others are less guilty before God than those who knowingly deceive the body of Christ and actively do their utmost to destroy others. I found the adjective 'Jesuitical' thought-provoking, as their policy is to infiltrate and pretend to be opposed to Catholic doctrines while wreaking havoc amongst the brethren.
    Re the Biblically sound groups before the Reformation (some known as Anabaptists), I believe there were such people who were persecuted by the Vatican and the reformers, who at times even joined forces together against them. Zwingli had a policy of drowning them as they stood against infant baptism, an error which reformers held onto. (Calvin executed people, inc women abd children, over this issue). The reformation did much good but was not without its errors and its own persecution of those who disagreed with those errors. Jason Cooley, who I do not fully endorse, has some good messages on the history of the baptists and what they suffered on YouTube and sermonaudio.com. Great research on JP Treena, Mike

    ReplyDelete
  9. It is true that Prasch did have some valid arguments against false teachers Mike. .. for even Satan, (the father of lies) disguises himself as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14; John 8:44). Prasch has managed to gain quite a foothold within the leadership of the remnant church.. more so than I had realised. I do hope and pray that God brings some good out of this exposure, and that those taken in by Prasch will repent and begin to test the spirits. (1 John 4:1).
    Despite the Reformers serious error at times, I would not say that they "pretended to rediscover the gospel". Without Luther's breakthrough on "grace alone" we would all be RC as Colin says. Prasch always finds a way to put people down - he does not love the brethren.(1 John 3:14).
    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Without Luther's breakthrough on "grace alone" we would all be RC ???????
    Speak for yourself Treena - I have been spiritually regenerated/re-born through Jesus Christ's absolute faith in, and therefore absolute submission to His Father's eternal will.
    It is the SELFLESS, eternal faith OF Christ which saves the genuine believer and not our own self seeking, temporal faith - which is actually no faith at all - but a combination of intellectual belief and a sinful fallen desire for SELF betterment. As an aside, all bible translations wrongly translate the faith OF Christ as being faith IN Christ. An example of this is Galations 2/20 which has Paul stating that he lives by faith IN the Son of God instead of living by the faith OF the Son of God....
    Christ's true body preceded the 'Reformation' and has, and is surviving the decay and breakdown of that 'Reformation'.
    The Reformation can be likened to a surgeon who has recognised and removed a considerable amount of cancer - but alas he has left some in - and it has grown again - and oh, how it has grown.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I speak generally Jack... the UK would be RC if not for the Reformers. I do realise that there is always a remnant.


    “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks it will be opened. Or which one of you, if his son asks him for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a serpent? If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask him! (Mathew 7:7-11).

    πίστει υἱοῦ "by faith in the Son" is not incorrect.. https://biblehub.com/lexicon/galatians/2-20.htm

    I don't want any protracted debates about Calvinism.

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Prasch had a long standing association with the ecumenical organisation Jews For Jesus.
    Prasch’s sponsor, Moishe Rosen undoubted involvement with ecumenism is another concerning piece of the Prasch jigsaw.

    http://www.spokesman.com/stories/1998/feb/21/jews-for-jesus-founder-will-share-experiences/
    UK Apologetics Library: http://ukapologeticslibrary.net/jews-for-jesus-ecumenism-exposed/"

    ReplyDelete
  13. People have been wondering why Moriel and Jimmy are so silent on this issue.
    Well self admitted liar Lydia aka Josh Chav has now become Jimmy's personal apologist much the way Richard Abanes ran confusion for Rick Warren before Warren kicked him to the curb.
    You cannot fight the facts.
    Moriel personal and followers do not want to even check the facts
    Lydia's new video that was not commissioned by Moriel (yeas right)side track dealing with the facts
    Instead they build upon other doctrines that David Nathan has since clarified his position.
    You cannot fight headstones and ancestry proof.
    Yes Jimmy for the most part is correct in much of his (except eschatology) so Moriel will stand on Jimmys doctrine is solid so thats the only thing that counts.
    Is it?
    Our enemy satan and his demons know scripture.
    Jacob is a proven liar and is not playing with a full deck.
    So you dont have to have godly character to be considered a false teacher.
    Wow thats not what scripture states.
    Titus 1:6-8 New American Standard Bible (NASB)
    6 namely, if any man is above reproach, the husband of one wife, having children who believe, not accused of dissipation or rebellion. 7 For the [a]overseer must be above reproach as God’s steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, not fond of sordid gain, 8 but hospitable, loving what is good, sensible, just, devout, self-controlled.
    And comments from someone smarter than me.
    In Titus 1:6–9, Paul reminds Titus about the type of godly character that should exemplify the life of an elder, including a list of vices to be avoided. Then, in verses 10–16, he provides a laundry list of the false teachers’ sins, demonstrating how much they differ morally from godly pastors.

    In verse 10, Paul writes, “There are many who are insubordinate, empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision party.” They weren’t working according to God-ordained authority structures. There’s a reason so many false teachers today begin new movements or work as independent ministers through television or the internet.

    In verse 11, Paul says the false teachers spread their views for “shameful gain.” We don’t know who supported these false teachers or how they supported them. All we know is financial gain motivated them. Many false teachers today accumulate great wealth by selling their bad doctrine to deceived people. (Think private jet.)

    In verses 12–13, Paul quotes from a Cretan philosopher named Epimenedes to further drive home the bad character of the false teachers: “One of the Cretans, a prophet of their own, said, ‘Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.’ This testimony is true.” A couple of things about this passage make some Christians squirm at first reading.

    First, is Paul claiming this pagan philosopher is a true prophet? No, he’s simply saying that what Epimenedes had to say proves true in this particular case. We do the same thing when we say someone “turned out to be a prophet.” Paul is a missionary, and in this letter he’s doing the same thing he did in Acts 17 at the Areopagus: contextualizing his message by meeting people where they are on their own cultural terms.

    Second, is Paul a racist because he agrees with the philosopher’s sweeping criticism of the Cretan people? Again, the answer is no—but this is a fair question. Epimenedes’s proverb was so common in the ancient world that the Greek word kretizein was used as a synonym for liar or cheater. While Epiminedes was criticizing Cretan people in general, Paul is saying the old adage about Cretans is true of these false teachers since they are liars and cheaters who can’t be trusted. They’re living up to the stereotype. They’re quintessential Cretans.

    Paul gives the false teachers a devastating diagnosis in verses 15 and 16:

    To the pure, all things are pure, but to the defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure; but both their minds and their consciences are defiled. They profess to know God, but they deny him by their works. They are detestable, disobedient, unfit for any good work

    ReplyDelete
  14. Treena, regarding Jews for Jesus.... Please stop slinging mud. Jacob addressed the issued with Jews for Jesus some time ago.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dz8lRI-oMQg&t=4s

    Jacob once supported Jews for Jesus but does not any longer.

    Stop your lies.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I did watch that video some time ago Anonymous, and I am well aware that Jacob Prasch no longer supports Jews For Jesus. Prasch did not mention that Jews For Jesus are ecumenical on that video did he? Have I touched a nerve? The evidence speaks for itself:

    "Rosen will speak at Manito Presbyterian Church, 401 E. 30th, at 6 p.m. today, and at the 8:15, 9:45 and 11:15 a.m. services on Sunday.
    He will also speak at 6 p.m. Sunday at Bethel Baptist Church in Coeur d’Alene, 2215 N. Seventh....
    12-step spirituality to be topic
    'The Spirituality of the Twelve Steps: A Way of Life for Anyone' is a workshop offered next month at the Roman Catholic Cathedral of Our Lady of Lourdes in cooperation with the Twelve Steps to Life Ministry, which meets at First Presbyterian Church."
    http://www.spokesman.com/stories/1998/feb/21/jews-for-jesus-founder-will-share-experiences/

    See also: UK Apologetics Library: http://ukapologeticslibrary.net/jews-for-jesus-ecumenism-exposed/

    ReplyDelete
  16. The fact that Jacob explains that Richard Harvey preached at Sizer's church makes it pretty obvious ecumenism is an issue.

    You refer to: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/1998/feb/21/jews-for-jesus-founder-will-share-experiences/

    Quite what this link has to do with Jacob, I don't know. He no longer supports Jews for Jesus.

    You and the people you have aligned with are like a pack of dogs. Attack after attack, five minute films here, five minute films there...to keep all the viciousness going. I think you will all only be satisfied if Jacob drops dead.

    Treena, God help you if your own life is not in order.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I have simply connected the dots Anonymous.. Ecumenist Moishe Rosen WAS Prasch's sponsor. There WAS a long standing association between Prasch Jews For Jesus. Prasch's ecumenical links are historical. Prasch speaks out of both sides of his mouth, condemning ecumenism on the one hand whilst supporting ecumenists like David Noakes and Clifford Hill of Issachar Ministries.

    There is nothing vicious about exposing the truth Anonymous.

    I will answer to God - as will fake Jew Jacob Prasch and his supporters.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Further evidence that Moishe Rosen was involved with ecumenism:

    JESUS JOY FESTIVAL 1972

    "Mr. Rosen was a principal speaker at a 'Jesus Joy Festival' in Felt Forum at Madison Square Garden, held under the auspices of Maranatha ‘Ministries' of New Milford, N.J. one of the leading voices of the so called “Jesus People” movement..

    Speakers, in addition to Mr. Rosen, included Tom Skinner, a former leader of the Harlem Lords; Scott Ross, a “Christian disc jockey"; the Rev. Paul S. Moore of Maranatha and the Rev. Jack Sutton, a Roman Catholic priest."

    https://www.nytimes.com/1972/09/05/archives/the-founder-of-jews-for-jesus-in-rally-here-stresses-heshttps://www.nytimes.com/1972/09/05

    Marathana is now Marathana Church of the Nazarene..
    https://www.maranathanj.org/ourhistory

    ReplyDelete
  19. "In the mid-1950s when the Catholic church in Manhattan offered a yearlong set of classes that focused on the practical aspects of mission work, Rosen enrolled for the entire sequence of courses. Ceil (his wife) also attended this missionary training by the Catholic church.."

    https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=za5_CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA153&lpg=PA153&dq=martin+meyer+rosen+1932+-+2010+roman+catholic&source=bl&ots=7pE3OsHdnp&sig=ACfU3U1FqcEWslKSBSvP0_yBV_RLxeP7kw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwihjNLx1PLhAhVJQxUIHZ-FCKAQ6AEwDHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=martin%20meyer%20rosen%201932%20-%202010%20roman%20catholic&f=false

    ReplyDelete
  20. RAGE!!

    "In her doctoral dissertation on Jews for Jesus, Juliene Lipson describes how she infiltrated the group and discovered a disturbing side to Jews for Jesus and Rosen. According to Lipson, members agreed that “full submission to the leadership of Rosen is the will of God.” She also described a meeting where “members were asked to stand, whereupon [Rosen] struck each one across the face hard enough to knock them over.”
    On the website www.UsedForJesus.com, ex-Jews for Jesus staff members testify to the abusive and cult-like atmosphere within Jews for Jesus, including the above mentioned “pain training” as well as shunning of former members, rigid restrictions to personal life, and raging and intense anger. I met Rosen on three occasions and each time witnessed his inexplicable outbursts of rage."

    https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-deceptive-destructive-legacy-of-moishe-rosen/2010/05/26/

    ReplyDelete
  21. Did you see the last page of Prasch's Moriel Quarterly, the most recent 2019 addition? It has the cover for Prasch's upcoming book called 'A Lamp To My Feet' with a guy carrying a Jewish Menorah. So Prasch is still persisting in the Jewish schtick.
    http://moriel.org/newsletters.html

    ReplyDelete
  22. - and he continues to display the hexagram!

    ReplyDelete